Line Leduc

3.8k citations
56 papers · 1.6k indexed · h-index 22

Line Leduc

56 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Line Leduc
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 762
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 786
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 392
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 352
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 134
Replace Jukka Uotila with:
Jukka Uotila Finland
Yaprak Engin Üstün Türkiye
Terrence K. Allen United States
Brian Kirshon United States
Hiroaki Tanaka Japan
Craig A. Nankervis United States
Vorapong Phupong Thailand
Arnon Samueloff Israel
Stefania Di Gangi Italy
Janice E. Whitty United States
Line Leduc relative to Jukka Uotila Finland Jukka Uotila's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.3×
Jukka Uotila · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Line Leduc

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Line Leduc's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Line Leduc with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Line Leduc more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Line Leduc

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Line Leduc. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Line Leduc. The network helps show where Line Leduc may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Line Leduc, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Line Leduc Line = papers co-authored together Line Leduc links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20242
2 201840
3 201817
4 20169
5 20128
6 201123
7 201046
8 200617
9 200530
10 200545
11 2004113
12 200415
13 200049
14 1997137
15 19951
16 199222
17 19914
18 199149
19 199115
20 199030

About Line Leduc

Line Leduc is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 56 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (22 papers), Cardiovascular Issues in Pregnancy (14 papers), Birth, Development, and Health (11 papers), Gestational Diabetes Research and Management (8 papers), Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair (7 papers), Maternal and fetal healthcare (5 papers), Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (5 papers) and Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (762 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (786 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (392 citations). Line Leduc has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Annie Dore, Haim A. Abenhaim, Lise‐Andrée Mercier, Laurent Azoulay, Michael S. Kramer, Josée Dubois, Andrée Grignon, Michel Lemay, Shu Qin Wei and Wei Guang Bi. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada, European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Obstetrics and Gynecology and The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026