Linda Thélèmaque
- Oncology top 10%
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Epidemiology
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Co-authors
- Lina JandorfSteven H. ItzkowitzKatherine N. DuHamelGary WinkelAnabella CastilloDeborah O. ErwinWilliam H. ReddRachel C. Shelton
- Topics
- Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (13 papers)Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (13 papers)Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesVietnam
In The Last Decade
Linda Thélèmaque
22 papers receiving 596 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
- Oncology 402
- General Health Professions 170
- Epidemiology 135
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 98
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 64
Countries citing papers authored by Linda Thélèmaque
This map shows the geographic impact of Linda Thélèmaque's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Linda Thélèmaque with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Linda Thélèmaque more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Linda Thélèmaque
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Linda Thélèmaque. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Linda Thélèmaque. The network helps show where Linda Thélèmaque may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Linda Thélèmaque
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Linda Thélèmaque. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Linda Thélèmaque based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Linda Thélèmaque. Linda Thélèmaque is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9 | |
| 2 | 7 | |
| 3 | 38 | |
| 4 | 15 | |
| 5 | 15 | |
| 6 | 14 | |
| 7 | 49 | |
| 8 | 92 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 20 | |
| 11 | 17 | |
| 12 | 45 | |
| 13 | 37 | |
| 14 | 16 | |
| 15 | 34 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 43 | |
| 18 | 82 | |
| 19 | Sociodemographic correlates of stage of adoption for colorectal cancer screening in African Americans. | 17 |
| 20 | 47 |
About Linda Thélèmaque
Linda Thélèmaque is a scholar working on Oncology, Epidemiology and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 22 papers that have together received 618 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (13 papers), Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (13 papers) and Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (402 citations), General Health Professions (170 citations) and Health (43 citations). Linda Thélèmaque has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Vietnam. Frequent co-authors include Lina Jandorf, Steven H. Itzkowitz, Katherine N. DuHamel, Gary Winkel, Anabella Castillo, Deborah O. Erwin, William H. Redd, Rachel C. Shelton, Hayley S. Thompson and Cristina Villagra. Their work appears in journals such as Gastroenterology, Cancer and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.