Linda Nash
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Geography, Planning and Development top 2%
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law top 10%
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
- Political Science and International Relations top 10%
- Co-authors
- Michael A. ZevonJurgis KaruzaTiffany PattersonShilpi AjwaniAjesh GeorgeMaree JohnsonJody A. RobertsBarbara L. Allen
- Topics
- American Environmental and Regional History (6 papers)American History and Culture (5 papers)Archaeology and Natural History (3 papers)
- Cited by
- Geography, Planning and DevelopmentHistory and Philosophy of ScienceManagement, Monitoring, Policy and Law
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaCanada
In The Last Decade
Linda Nash
13 papers receiving 345 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
- Sociology and Political Science 140
- Geography, Planning and Development 83
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 65
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 55
- Political Science and International Relations 47
Countries citing papers authored by Linda Nash
This map shows the geographic impact of Linda Nash's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Linda Nash with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Linda Nash more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Linda Nash
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Linda Nash. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Linda Nash. The network helps show where Linda Nash may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Linda Nash
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Linda Nash. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Linda Nash based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Linda Nash. Linda Nash is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 22 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 26 | |
| 7 | Inescapable Ecologies: A History of Environment, Disease, and Knowledge | 124 |
| 8 | 137 | |
| 9 | 48 | |
| 10 | 15 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 15 | |
| 13 | 4 | |
| 14 | 29 |
About Linda Nash
Linda Nash is a scholar working on Marketing, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 14 papers that have together received 430 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include American Environmental and Regional History (6 papers), American History and Culture (5 papers) and Archaeology and Natural History (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geography, Planning and Development (83 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (35 citations) and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (65 citations). Linda Nash has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Michael A. Zevon, Jurgis Karuza, Tiffany Patterson, Shilpi Ajwani, Ajesh George, Maree Johnson, Jody A. Roberts, Barbara L. Allen, Scott Frickel and Nancy Langston. Their work appears in journals such as Psychology and Aging, Journal of American History and BMC Oral Health.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.