Linda M. Drew

981 total citations
9 papers, 683 citations indexed

About

Linda M. Drew is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism. According to data from OpenAlex, Linda M. Drew has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 683 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 3 papers in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology and 3 papers in Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism. Recurrent topics in Linda M. Drew's work include Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (4 papers), Diabetes Management and Research (3 papers) and Aging and Gerontology Research (3 papers). Linda M. Drew is often cited by papers focused on Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (4 papers), Diabetes Management and Research (3 papers) and Aging and Gerontology Research (3 papers). Linda M. Drew collaborates with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Linda M. Drew's co-authors include Denise C. Park, Sara Haber, Merril Silverstein, Andrew Hebrank, Jennifer Lodi‐Smith, Gérard N. Bischof, Whitley W. Aamodt, Micaela Y. Chan, Cynthia A. Berg and Deborah J. Wiebe and has published in prestigious journals such as Psychological Science, Journal of Adolescent Health and The Gerontologist.

In The Last Decade

Linda M. Drew

9 papers receiving 658 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Linda M. Drew United States	9	204	168	137	126	123	9	683
Vera Heyl Germany	17	102 0.5×	90 0.5×	83 0.6×	157 1.2×	189 1.5×	41	878
Andrew M. Kiselica United States	17	116 0.6×	276 1.6×	70 0.5×	24 0.2×	52 0.4×	73	758
Alejandra Morlett Paredes United States	19	29 0.1×	240 1.4×	71 0.5×	55 0.4×	75 0.6×	59	847
Xinfeng Tang China	14	37 0.2×	82 0.5×	158 1.2×	21 0.2×	110 0.9×	32	840
D. C. Park United States	11	52 0.3×	91 0.5×	58 0.4×	120 1.0×	37 0.3×	12	748
Raphaël Trouillet France	16	26 0.1×	84 0.5×	86 0.6×	39 0.3×	91 0.7×	40	699
Matthew L. Hughes United States	11	41 0.2×	58 0.3×	40 0.3×	128 1.0×	68 0.6×	18	401
Julie A. Avanzino United States	11	45 0.2×	46 0.3×	39 0.3×	93 0.7×	105 0.9×	11	732
Lizzy Boots Netherlands	13	103 0.5×	532 3.2×	210 1.5×	19 0.2×	79 0.6×	23	905
Saoirse Finn United Kingdom	9	27 0.1×	91 0.5×	123 0.9×	44 0.3×	93 0.8×	12	873

Countries citing papers authored by Linda M. Drew

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Linda M. Drew's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Linda M. Drew with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Linda M. Drew more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Linda M. Drew

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Linda M. Drew. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Linda M. Drew. The network helps show where Linda M. Drew may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Linda M. Drew

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Linda M. Drew. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Linda M. Drew based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Linda M. Drew. Linda M. Drew is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

Chan, Micaela Y., Sara Haber, Linda M. Drew, & Denise C. Park. (2014). Training Older Adults to Use Tablet Computers: Does It Enhance Cognitive Function?. The Gerontologist. 56(3). 475–484. 150 indexed citations

Park, Denise C., Jennifer Lodi‐Smith, Linda M. Drew, et al.. (2013). The Impact of Sustained Engagement on Cognitive Function in Older Adults. Psychological Science. 25(1). 103–112. 270 indexed citations

Drew, Linda M., et al.. (2011). Depleted parental psychological resources as mediators of the association of income with adherence and metabolic control.. Journal of Family Psychology. 25(5). 751–758. 29 indexed citations

King, Pamela S., Cynthia A. Berg, Jonathan Butner, et al.. (2011). Longitudinal Trajectories of Metabolic Control Across Adolescence: Associations With Parental Involvement, Adolescents' Psychosocial Maturity, and Health Care Utilization. Journal of Adolescent Health. 50(5). 491–496. 80 indexed citations

Drew, Linda M., Cynthia A. Berg, & Deborah J. Wiebe. (2010). The mediating role of extreme peer orientation in the relationships between adolescent–parent relationship and diabetes management.. Journal of Family Psychology. 24(3). 299–306. 43 indexed citations

Drew, Linda M. & Merril Silverstein. (2007). Grandparents' psychological well-being after loss of contact with their grandchildren.. Journal of Family Psychology. 21(3). 372–379. 62 indexed citations

Drew, Linda M. & Merril Silverstein. (2004). Inter-generational role investments of great-grandparents: consequences for psychological well-being. Ageing and Society. 24(1). 95–111. 22 indexed citations

Drew, Linda M. & Peter K. Smith. (2002). Implications for grandparents when they lose contact with their grandchildren: Divorce, family feud, and geographical separation.. 11 indexed citations

Drew, Linda M., et al.. (1998). Grandparenting and its Relationship to Parenting. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 3(3). 465–480. 16 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact