Linda Ford
- Global and Planetary Change top 5%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 5%
- Ecological Modeling top 2%
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 10%
- Ecology top 10%
- Co-authors
- David C. CannatellaAna K. Rosen VollmarJames MacklinRobert S. HoffmanBreda M. ZimkusRobert E. GroppKatherine E. LeVanNeil S. Cobb
- Topics
- Species Distribution and Climate Change (10 papers)Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies (7 papers)Amphibian and Reptile Biology (6 papers)
- Journals
- BioScienceBMC BiologyAgronomy
- Partner nations
- United StatesNetherlandsGermany
In The Last Decade
Linda Ford
17 papers receiving 670 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
- Global and Planetary Change 383
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 248
- Ecological Modeling 207
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 162
- Ecology 158
Countries citing papers authored by Linda Ford
This map shows the geographic impact of Linda Ford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Linda Ford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Linda Ford more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Linda Ford
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Linda Ford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Linda Ford. The network helps show where Linda Ford may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Linda Ford
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Linda Ford. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Linda Ford based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Linda Ford. Linda Ford is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 131 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 11 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 28 | |
| 10 | Roads to riches: development of the main road network in the Mackay district of tropical Queensland: the first 100 years | 0 |
| 11 | 83 | |
| 12 | Non-Standard Sources in a Standardized World: Responsible Practice and Ethics of Acquiring Turtle Specimens for Scientific Use | 1 |
| 13 | 34 | |
| 14 | 364 | |
| 15 | Phylogenetic assessment of the anuran pectoral girdle | 1 |
| 16 | 40 | |
| 17 | On Atopophrynus, a recently described frog wrongly assigned to the Dendrobatidae. American Museum novitates ; no. 2843 | 5 |
| 18 | 7 | |
| 19 | 10 | |
| 20 | 5 |
About Linda Ford
Linda Ford is a scholar working on Ecological Modeling, Ecology and Conservation, having authored 20 papers that have together received 738 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Species Distribution and Climate Change (10 papers), Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies (7 papers) and Amphibian and Reptile Biology (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (207 citations), Global and Planetary Change (383 citations) and Paleontology (99 citations). Linda Ford has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Germany. Frequent co-authors include David C. Cannatella, Ana K. Rosen Vollmar, James Macklin, Robert S. Hoffman, Breda M. Zimkus, Robert E. Gropp, Katherine E. LeVan, Neil S. Cobb, M. Catherine Aime and Elizabeth R. Ellwood. Their work appears in journals such as BioScience, BMC Biology and Agronomy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.