Linda E. Newstrom‐Lloyd
-
- Plant and animal studies 9
- Insect Science top 1%
- Insect and Pesticide Research 9
-
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies 2
- Plant Science top 5%
- Plant Parasitism and Resistance 2
- Genetically Modified Organisms Research 1
- Genetics top 10%
- Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior 4
-
- CRISPR and Genetic Engineering 1
- Plant tissue culture and regeneration 1
- Co-authors
- Andreas JürgensSimon G. PottsGidi Ne’emanAmots DafniBrad G. HowlettD.A.J. TeulonM.K. WalkerRomina Rader
- Cited by
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and SystematicsInsect ScienceNature and Landscape Conservation
- Journals
- Journal of Applied Ecology (1 paper)Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society (1 paper)Euphytica (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- New ZealandAustraliaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Linda E. Newstrom‐Lloyd
9 papers receiving 850 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 744
- Insect Science 455
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 198
- Plant Science 537
- Genetics 212
Countries citing papers authored by Linda E. Newstrom‐Lloyd
This map shows the geographic impact of Linda E. Newstrom‐Lloyd's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Linda E. Newstrom‐Lloyd with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Linda E. Newstrom‐Lloyd more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Linda E. Newstrom‐Lloyd
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Linda E. Newstrom‐Lloyd. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Linda E. Newstrom‐Lloyd. The network helps show where Linda E. Newstrom‐Lloyd may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 24 scholars most cited alongside Linda E. Newstrom‐Lloyd, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2018 | 29 | |
| 2 | 2013 | 7 | |
| 3 | 2011 | 47 | |
| 4 | 2009 | 321 | |
| 5 | A framework for comparing pollinator performance: effectiveness and efficiency. Biol Rev | 2009 | 0 |
| 6 | 2009 | 261 | |
| 7 | 2009 | 37 | |
| 8 | 2007 | 118 | |
| 9 | MONITORING: AN ESSENTIAL TOOL IN BEE ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION | 2002 | 7 |
| 10 | 1998 | 61 |
About Linda E. Newstrom‐Lloyd
Linda E. Newstrom‐Lloyd is a scholar working on Insect Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Nature and Landscape Conservation, having authored 10 papers that have together received 888 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant and animal studies (9 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (9 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (4 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (2 papers), Plant Parasitism and Resistance (2 papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (1 paper), Genetically Modified Organisms Research (1 paper) and Plant tissue culture and regeneration (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (744 citations), Insect Science (455 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (198 citations). Linda E. Newstrom‐Lloyd has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Andreas Jürgens, Simon G. Potts, Gidi Ne’eman, Amots Dafni, Brad G. Howlett, D.A.J. Teulon, M.K. Walker, Romina Rader, Saul A. Cunningham and Will Edwards. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Applied Ecology, Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society and Euphytica.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.