Lina Koppel

3.1k citations
14 papers · 316 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Lina Koppel

11 papers receiving 307 citations

Peers

Lina Koppel
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • General Decision Sciences 55
  • Applied Psychology 52
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 141
  • Social Psychology 103
  • Safety Research 39
Replace Andrea Pittarello with:
Andrea Pittarello United States
Kyle D. Dillon United States
Michael T. Bixter United States
Florian Fessel United States
Xianchi Dai Hong Kong
Taekyun Hur South Korea
Rachel Smallman United States
Benjamin Bushong United States
Jinyi Kuang United States
Max Rollwage United Kingdom
Lina Koppel relative to Andrea Pittarello United States Andrea Pittarello's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Andrea Pittarello · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Lina Koppel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lina Koppel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lina Koppel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lina Koppel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lina Koppel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lina Koppel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lina Koppel. The network helps show where Lina Koppel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Lina Koppel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Lina Koppel Line = papers co-authored together Lina Koppel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 2016100
2 201680
3 201739
4 202133
5 201929
6 201712
7 201911
8 20228
9
Ego depletion and risk taking
20191
10 20241
11 20231
12 20251
13 20250
14 20250

About Lina Koppel

Lina Koppel is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, General Decision Sciences, Sociology and Political Science and Safety Research, having authored 14 papers that have together received 316 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (4 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (2 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (2 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (2 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (2 papers), Emotions and Moral Behavior (1 paper), Cognitive and psychological constructs research (1 paper) and scientometrics and bibliometrics research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (55 citations), Applied Psychology (52 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (141 citations), Social Psychology (103 citations) and Safety Research (39 citations). Lina Koppel has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, United States and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Daniel Västfjäll, Gustav Tinghög, David Andersson, Erkin Asutay, Magnus Johannesson, Michael Kirchler, Arvid Erlandsson, William J. Burns, Paul Slovic and India Morrison. Their work appears in journals such as Scientific Reports, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Cognition, Cerebral Cortex and Experimental Economics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact