Lidia Rodríguez‐Ortiz
- Surgery
- Emergency Medicine top 5%
- Reproductive Medicine top 10%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
- Oncology
- Co-authors
- Juan Manuel Sánchez‐HidalgoÁlvaro Arjona‐SánchezSebastián Rufián‐PeñaJavier Briceño‐DelgadoÁngela Casado-AdamAntonio CosanoAntonio Romero‐RuízCésar Díaz‐López
- Topics
- Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies (21 papers)Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management (15 papers)Hernia repair and management (8 papers)
- Partner nations
- SpainUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Lidia Rodríguez‐Ortiz
26 papers receiving 209 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
- Surgery 183
- Emergency Medicine 120
- Reproductive Medicine 95
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 24
- Oncology 23
Countries citing papers authored by Lidia Rodríguez‐Ortiz
This map shows the geographic impact of Lidia Rodríguez‐Ortiz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lidia Rodríguez‐Ortiz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lidia Rodríguez‐Ortiz more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Lidia Rodríguez‐Ortiz
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lidia Rodríguez‐Ortiz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lidia Rodríguez‐Ortiz. The network helps show where Lidia Rodríguez‐Ortiz may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lidia Rodríguez‐Ortiz
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lidia Rodríguez‐Ortiz. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lidia Rodríguez‐Ortiz based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Lidia Rodríguez‐Ortiz. Lidia Rodríguez‐Ortiz is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | 6 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | 0 | |
| 13 | 14 | |
| 14 | 12 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 7 | |
| 17 | 24 | |
| 18 | 77 | |
| 19 | 3 | |
| 20 | 4 |
About Lidia Rodríguez‐Ortiz
Lidia Rodríguez‐Ortiz is a scholar working on Emergency Medicine, Transplantation and Reproductive Medicine, having authored 29 papers that have together received 211 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies (21 papers), Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management (15 papers) and Hernia repair and management (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Emergency Medicine (120 citations), Reproductive Medicine (95 citations) and Surgery (183 citations). Lidia Rodríguez‐Ortiz has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Juan Manuel Sánchez‐Hidalgo, Álvaro Arjona‐Sánchez, Sebastián Rufián‐Peña, Javier Briceño‐Delgado, Ángela Casado-Adam, Antonio Cosano, Antonio Romero‐Ruíz, César Díaz‐López, Guillaume Passot and Omer Aziz. Their work appears in journals such as British journal of surgery, World Journal of Gastroenterology and Annals of Surgical Oncology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.