Liam Wren‐Lewis
- Economics and Econometrics top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Strategy and Management top 10%
- Management Science and Operations Research top 10%
- Finance top 10%
- Co-authors
- Antonio EstacheMike BrewerMax Friedrich SteinhardtDaniel ClarkeKenneth HoungbedjiTomás SerebriskyLuke SibietaKaren Macours
- Topics
- Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (6 papers)Auction Theory and Applications (6 papers)Corruption and Economic Development (3 papers)
- Cited by
- Strategy and ManagementEconomics and EconometricsGeneral Economics, Econometrics and Finance
- Partner nations
- FranceBelgiumUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Liam Wren‐Lewis
24 papers receiving 340 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
- Economics and Econometrics 175
- Sociology and Political Science 130
- Strategy and Management 112
- Management Science and Operations Research 44
- Finance 41
Countries citing papers authored by Liam Wren‐Lewis
This map shows the geographic impact of Liam Wren‐Lewis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Liam Wren‐Lewis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Liam Wren‐Lewis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Liam Wren‐Lewis
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Liam Wren‐Lewis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Liam Wren‐Lewis. The network helps show where Liam Wren‐Lewis may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Liam Wren‐Lewis
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Liam Wren‐Lewis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Liam Wren‐Lewis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Liam Wren‐Lewis. Liam Wren‐Lewis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 36 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 7 | |
| 7 | 51 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 6 | |
| 10 | Commitment in Utility Regulation: A Model of Reputation and Policy Applications | 0 |
| 11 | 14 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 6 | |
| 14 | 2 | |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | 10 | |
| 17 | What Anti-Corruption Policy Can Learn from Theories of Sector Regulation | 2 |
| 18 | 137 | |
| 19 | Towards a Theory of Regulation for Developing Countries: Insights from Jean-Jacques Laffont’s last book | 7 |
| 20 | 2 |
About Liam Wren‐Lewis
Liam Wren‐Lewis is a scholar working on Development, Strategy and Management and Management Science and Operations Research, having authored 26 papers that have together received 378 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (6 papers), Auction Theory and Applications (6 papers) and Corruption and Economic Development (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Strategy and Management (112 citations), Economics and Econometrics (175 citations) and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (40 citations). Liam Wren‐Lewis has collaborated with scholars based in France, Belgium and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Antonio Estache, Mike Brewer, Max Friedrich Steinhardt, Daniel Clarke, Kenneth Houngbedji, Antonio Estache, Tomás Serebrisky, Luke Sibieta, Karen Macours and Jérémie Gignoux. Their work appears in journals such as Science Advances, Journal of Economic Literature and Journal of Public Economics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.