Lia J. Smith

981 citations
36 papers · 719 indexed · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Lia J. Smith

34 papers receiving 697 citations

Peers

Lia J. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Occupational Therapy 119
  • Applied Psychology 127
  • Clinical Psychology 381
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 134
  • Physiology 166
Replace Missy Peterson with:
Missy Peterson United States
Brad Wipfli United States
Mathilde Horn France
Sophia Helen Adam Germany
Carrie J. Donoho United States
Allison A. Roodman United States
José Manuel Granada-López Spain
Dennis Tirch United States
Mariel S. Bello United States
Jenni B. Teeters United States
Lia J. Smith relative to Missy Peterson United States Missy Peterson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Missy Peterson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Lia J. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lia J. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lia J. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lia J. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lia J. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lia J. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lia J. Smith. The network helps show where Lia J. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Lia J. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Lia J. Smith Line = papers co-authored together Lia J. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20242
2 20231
3 202113
4 202116
5 202017
6 202018
7 201915
8 201811
9 201847
10 201822
11 201841
12 201810
13 201812
14 201720
15 201727
16 20177
17 201714
18 201716
19 201630
20 201485

About Lia J. Smith

Lia J. Smith is a scholar working on Occupational Therapy, Clinical Psychology, Applied Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Behavioral Neuroscience, having authored 36 papers that have together received 719 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (17 papers), Resilience and Mental Health (10 papers), Occupational Health and Performance (7 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (5 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury Research (5 papers), Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (5 papers), Smoking Behavior and Cessation (5 papers) and Sleep and related disorders (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Occupational Therapy (119 citations), Applied Psychology (127 citations), Clinical Psychology (381 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (134 citations) and Physiology (166 citations). Lia J. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Anka A. Vujanovic, Jana K. Tran, Andrea C. King, Matthew W. Gallagher, Patrick J. McNamara, Alicia K. Matthews, Daniel J. Fridberg, Angela L. Richardson, Laura J. Long and Johann M. D’Souza. Their work appears in journals such as Psychiatry Research, Mindfulness, Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, Cognitive Behaviour Therapy and Comprehensive Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026