Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Functional aspects of the tear film lipid layer
2003622 citationsAnthony J. Bron, John M. Tiffany et al.Experimental Eye Researchprofile →
Peers
Li Wern Voon
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health642
This map shows the geographic impact of Li Wern Voon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Li Wern Voon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Li Wern Voon more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Li Wern Voon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Li Wern Voon. The network helps show where Li Wern Voon may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Li Wern Voon
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Li Wern Voon.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Li Wern Voon based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Li Wern Voon. Li Wern Voon is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.