Li Lim

1.5k citations
43 papers · 1.1k indexed · h-index 21

Impact in

Papers in

Li Lim

41 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Li Lim
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • Ophthalmology 524
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 832
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 500
  • Epidemiology 253
  • Endocrinology 31
Replace Esko Aine with:
Esko Aine Finland
Rohit Shetty India
Cengiz Aras Türkiye
Javier Millán Soria Spain
Toshiyuki Yokoyama Japan
Xiaoying Wang China
David J. Weissgold United States
Victoria Chang United States
Zubair Ansari United States
P. Andrew Pearson United States
Li Lim relative to Esko Aine Finland Esko Aine's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10.7×
Esko Aine · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Li Lim

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Li Lim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Li Lim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Li Lim more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Li Lim

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Li Lim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Li Lim. The network helps show where Li Lim may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Li Lim, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Li Lim Line = papers co-authored together Li Lim links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000142
2 200660
3
Therapeutic use of Bausch & Lomb PureVision contact lenses.
200158
4 200756
5 201855
6 201553
7 199953
8 200048
9 202048
10 200641
11 201837
12 202033
13 201129
14 200729
15 200329
16 200028
17 201728
18 200427
19 200627
20 201123

About Li Lim

Li Lim is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Ophthalmology, Epidemiology and Spectroscopy, having authored 43 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Corneal surgery and disorders (28 papers), Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (26 papers), Corneal Surgery and Treatments (22 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (10 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (8 papers), Ocular Infections and Treatments (8 papers), Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (3 papers) and Analytical chemistry methods development (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (524 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (832 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (500 citations), Epidemiology (253 citations) and Endocrinology (31 citations). Li Lim has collaborated with scholars based in Singapore, China and United States. Frequent co-authors include Donald Tan, Rui Wei, Douglas J. Coster, Konrad Pesudovs, Cordelia Chan, Wing-Kwong Chan, Toshifumi Takeuchi, Aliza Jap, Daniel Chua and Y. Ingrid Goh. Their work appears in journals such as Eye & Contact Lens Science & Clinical Practice, Cornea, Journal of Refractive Surgery, Ophthalmology and Talanta.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact