Li Geng
- Epidemiology
- Molecular Biology
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism top 10%
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 10%
- Surgery
- Topics
- Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (12 papers)Reproductive tract infections research (7 papers)Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (6 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Clinical InvestigationSHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaJournal of the American College of Cardiology
- Partner nations
- ChinaUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Li Geng
70 papers receiving 983 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 137
- Epidemiology 215
- Molecular Biology 193
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 166
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 123
- Surgery 117
Countries citing papers authored by Li Geng
This map shows the geographic impact of Li Geng's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Li Geng with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Li Geng more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Li Geng
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Li Geng. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Li Geng. The network helps show where Li Geng may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Li Geng
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Li Geng. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Li Geng based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Li Geng. Li Geng is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 6 | |
| 6 | 6 | |
| 7 | 16 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 36 | |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 4 | |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | 16 | |
| 16 | 59 | |
| 17 | 10 | |
| 18 | Clinical Trial on Evaluation of Hybrid Capture II for Human Papillomavirus in Screening for Cervical Cancer and Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia | 2 |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | Control study of cognitive-behavior therapy in adolescents with Internet addiction disorder. | 16 |
About Li Geng
Li Geng is a scholar working on Complementary and alternative medicine, Microbiology and Dermatology, having authored 78 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (12 papers), Reproductive tract infections research (7 papers) and Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Microbiology (103 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (166 citations) and Complementary and alternative medicine (70 citations). Li Geng has collaborated with scholars based in China, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Jian‐Mei Li, Lampson Fan, Jie Qiao, Qinping Liao, Xuehong Song, Junya Chen, Hongxia Li, Nicola Giordan, Gavin Brooks and Fangfei Liu. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Investigation, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.