Li Deng

2.2k citations
80 papers · 1.7k · 1 hit paper · h-index 25

Impact in

Papers in

Li Deng

76 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Hit Papers

The impact of digital transformation on green innovation: Novel evidence from firm resilience perspective 2025 · 16 citations
160Years since publication51015

Peers

Li Deng
Comparison fields: 5 of 129
  • Biomaterials 458
  • Pharmaceutical Science 126
  • Genetics 137
  • Surgery 543
  • Urology 77
Replace Jieliang Shen with:
Jieliang Shen China
Olga Şoriţău Romania
Bin Jiang China
Dashuai Zhu United States
Patrick Lavigne Canada
Ho‐Jin Moon South Korea
Pravin D. Potdar India
Saeid Amanpour Iran
Sanam Dolati Iran
Jan‐Kan Chen Taiwan
Li Deng relative to Jieliang Shen China Jieliang Shen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Jieliang Shen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Li Deng

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Li Deng's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Li Deng with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Li Deng more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Li Deng

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Li Deng. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Li Deng. The network helps show where Li Deng may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Li Deng, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Li Deng Line = papers co-authored together Li Deng links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 80 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014129
2 2012117
3 200982
4 201969
5 200260
6 201657
7 201955
8 200953
9 201251
10 200347
11 201843
12 202042
13 201741
14 201938
15 200736
16 201634
17 202134
18 200632
19 201227
20 200627

About Li Deng

Li Deng is a scholar working on Surgery, Molecular Biology, Biomedical Engineering, Pharmaceutical Science and Biomaterials, having authored 80 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine (12 papers), Bone Tissue Engineering Materials (9 papers), Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications (6 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (5 papers), Mesenchymal stem cell research (4 papers), Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery (4 papers), Drug Solubulity and Delivery Systems (4 papers) and Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biomaterials (458 citations), Pharmaceutical Science (126 citations), Genetics (137 citations), Surgery (543 citations) and Urology (77 citations). Li Deng has collaborated with scholars based in China, Hong Kong and Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include Zhirong Zhang, Tao Gong, Xun Sun, Huiqi Xie, Jingcong Luo, Wei Zhi, Xiuqun Li, Bo Tan, Yanling Zhang and Lu Han. Their work appears in journals such as Biomaterials, Pharmaceutical Research, Journal of Materials Chemistry B, Molecular Pharmaceutics and Scientific Reports.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact