Lewis G. Bishop
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 5%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Genetics
- Molecular Biology
- Co-authors
- H EckertDavid DvorakG. D. McCannWalter KaiserDavid W. ChungHéctor R. FernándezLawrence StarkDouglas R. Yingst
- Topics
- Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (14 papers)Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (10 papers)Plant and animal studies (9 papers)
- Cited by
- Cellular and Molecular NeuroscienceEcology, Evolution, Behavior and SystematicsCognitive Neuroscience
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
Lewis G. Bishop
20 papers receiving 504 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 439
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 217
- Cognitive Neuroscience 171
- Genetics 159
- Molecular Biology 74
Countries citing papers authored by Lewis G. Bishop
This map shows the geographic impact of Lewis G. Bishop's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lewis G. Bishop with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lewis G. Bishop more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Lewis G. Bishop
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lewis G. Bishop. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lewis G. Bishop. The network helps show where Lewis G. Bishop may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lewis G. Bishop
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lewis G. Bishop. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lewis G. Bishop based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Lewis G. Bishop. Lewis G. Bishop is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 14 | |
| 2 | 12 | |
| 3 | 65 | |
| 4 | 7 | |
| 5 | 21 | |
| 6 | 93 | |
| 7 | 13 | |
| 8 | 34 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 6 | |
| 11 | 5 | |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | 19 | |
| 14 | 34 | |
| 15 | 20 | |
| 16 | 5 | |
| 17 | 102 | |
| 18 | 46 | |
| 19 | 26 | |
| 20 | 4 |
About Lewis G. Bishop
Lewis G. Bishop is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Developmental Biology, having authored 20 papers that have together received 532 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (14 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (10 papers) and Plant and animal studies (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (439 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (217 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (171 citations). Lewis G. Bishop has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include H Eckert, David Dvorak, G. D. McCann, Walter Kaiser, David W. Chung, Héctor R. Fernández, Lawrence Stark and Douglas R. Yingst. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Science and Journal of Neurophysiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.