Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The Mechanism of Drug Nephrotoxicity and the Methods for Preventing Kidney Damage
2021120 citationsEwa Kwiatkowska, Leszek Domański et al.International Journal of Molecular Sciencesprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Leszek Domański
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Leszek Domański's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Leszek Domański with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Leszek Domański more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Leszek Domański. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Leszek Domański. The network helps show where Leszek Domański may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Leszek Domański
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Leszek Domański.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Leszek Domański based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Leszek Domański. Leszek Domański is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Kwiatkowska, Ewa, Leszek Domański, Violetta Dziedziejko, et al.. (2021). The Mechanism of Drug Nephrotoxicity and the Methods for Preventing Kidney Damage. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 22(11). 6109–6109.120 indexed citations breakdown →
Domański, Leszek, Bogdan Flis, Henryka Jakuczun, & Ewa Zimnoch‐Guzowska. (2010). Variation of processing quality and tuber morphology traits in potato progenies derived from interploid matings 4x-2x.. Biuletyn Instytutu Hodowli i Aklimatyzacji Roślin. 57–69.2 indexed citations
13.
Domański, Leszek, et al.. (2009). Multicore-Based High Performance Image Analysis for Batch Processing in Drug Discovery. 47. 132–9.2 indexed citations
14.
Sulikowski, Tadeusz, Karol Tejchman, Leszek Domański, et al.. (2009). Histopathologic evaluation of pretransplantation biopsy as a factor influencing graft function after kidney transplantation in 3-year observation. Annals of Transplantation. 14(1). 48–48.1 indexed citations
Domański, Leszek, et al.. (2004). The germplasm release of M-62774 and M-62805 two potato clones with cold-sweetening resistance. Folia Horticulturae. 16(2). 33–40.2 indexed citations
19.
Świeżyński, K. M., et al.. (1997). Resistance to Phytophthora infestans in diploid and tetraploid potato families. 1. Resistance in detached leaflets. Journal of Applied Genetics. 38(1).2 indexed citations
20.
Świeżyński, K. M., et al.. (1993). Specific resistance to Phytophtora infestans in the potato. Genetica Polonica. 34(4). 327–336.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.