Leonie C.H. Wong
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
- Molecular Biology
- Rheumatology
- Endocrine and Autonomic Systems
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
- Co-authors
- Elijah R. BehrAyesha Al‐SabahT.E. HoustonPhilip D. CotterDavid F. BishopBarrie WoodcockEdward J. FitzsimonsAlison May
- Topics
- Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (5 papers)Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments (4 papers)Neuroscience of respiration and sleep (4 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Clinical InvestigationJournal of the American College of CardiologyThe Journal of Pediatrics
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesDenmark
In The Last Decade
Leonie C.H. Wong
10 papers receiving 220 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 104
- Molecular Biology 102
- Rheumatology 50
- Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 44
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 20
Countries citing papers authored by Leonie C.H. Wong
This map shows the geographic impact of Leonie C.H. Wong's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Leonie C.H. Wong with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Leonie C.H. Wong more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Leonie C.H. Wong
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Leonie C.H. Wong. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Leonie C.H. Wong. The network helps show where Leonie C.H. Wong may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Leonie C.H. Wong
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Leonie C.H. Wong. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Leonie C.H. Wong based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Leonie C.H. Wong. Leonie C.H. Wong is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 9 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 57 | |
| 7 | 18 | |
| 8 | 8 | |
| 9 | 28 | |
| 10 | 28 | |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | 71 |
About Leonie C.H. Wong
Leonie C.H. Wong is a scholar working on Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Pharmacy, having authored 12 papers that have together received 224 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (5 papers), Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments (4 papers) and Neuroscience of respiration and sleep (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (44 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (104 citations) and Rheumatology (50 citations). Leonie C.H. Wong has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Elijah R. Behr, Ayesha Al‐Sabah, T.E. Houston, Philip D. Cotter, David F. Bishop, Barrie Woodcock, Edward J. Fitzsimons, Alison May, Ferran Rosés‐Noguer and Janice Till. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Investigation, Journal of the American College of Cardiology and The Journal of Pediatrics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.