Leonardo Chwif

473 total citations
28 papers, 319 citations indexed

About

Leonardo Chwif is a scholar working on Management Science and Operations Research, Software and Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, Leonardo Chwif has authored 28 papers receiving a total of 319 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 19 papers in Management Science and Operations Research, 7 papers in Software and 7 papers in Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering. Recurrent topics in Leonardo Chwif's work include Simulation Techniques and Applications (16 papers), Advanced Manufacturing and Logistics Optimization (4 papers) and Business Process Modeling and Analysis (4 papers). Leonardo Chwif is often cited by papers focused on Simulation Techniques and Applications (16 papers), Advanced Manufacturing and Logistics Optimization (4 papers) and Business Process Modeling and Analysis (4 papers). Leonardo Chwif collaborates with scholars based in Brazil, Mexico and United Kingdom. Leonardo Chwif's co-authors include R.J. Paul, Jasmine Banks, Ray J. Paul, Tillal Eldabi, Jerry Banks, José Arnaldo Barra Montevechi and Darli Rodrigues Vieira and has published in prestigious journals such as Computers in Industry, Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory and Journal of Simulation.

In The Last Decade

Leonardo Chwif

26 papers receiving 298 citations

Peers

Leonardo Chwif
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • Management Science and Operations Research 146
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 145
  • Management Information Systems 75
  • Building and Construction 66
  • Computer Networks and Communications 23
Replace David Sturrock with:
David Sturrock United States
Jean O'reilly United Kingdom
John Ladbrook United Kingdom
Terrence Perera United Kingdom
Sören Bergmann Germany
Biman K. Ghosh United States
Thierry Coudert France
Paul Stanfield United States
Hassan Khademi Zare Iran
David Koonce United States
David Sturrock United States View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Leonardo Chwif
Leonardo Chwif · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Leonardo Chwif
Leonardo Chwif · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Leonardo Chwif

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Leonardo Chwif's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Leonardo Chwif with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Leonardo Chwif more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Leonardo Chwif

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Leonardo Chwif. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Leonardo Chwif. The network helps show where Leonardo Chwif may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Leonardo Chwif

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Leonardo Chwif. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Leonardo Chwif based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Leonardo Chwif. Leonardo Chwif is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 1
2 1
3 2
4 1
5 0
6 1
7 1
8 1
9 3
10 3
11 8
12 1
13 1
14 20
15 1
16 18
17 25
18 2
19 3
20 78

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026