Leo van de Berg

34.0k total citations
8 papers, 528 citations indexed

About

Leo van de Berg is a scholar working on Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change and Artificial Intelligence. According to data from OpenAlex, Leo van de Berg has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 528 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Atmospheric Science, 6 papers in Global and Planetary Change and 2 papers in Artificial Intelligence. Recurrent topics in Leo van de Berg's work include Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations (5 papers), Atmospheric Ozone and Climate (4 papers) and Climate variability and models (4 papers). Leo van de Berg is often cited by papers focused on Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations (5 papers), Atmospheric Ozone and Climate (4 papers) and Climate variability and models (4 papers). Leo van de Berg collaborates with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and United States. Leo van de Berg's co-authors include Johannes Schmetz, Stephen Tjemkes, Kenneth Holmlund, B. Strauss, Brian Mason, Xiangqian Wu, W. Paul Menzel, Marianne König and Christopher S. Velden and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, Journal of Climate and Geophysical Research Letters.

In The Last Decade

Leo van de Berg

8 papers receiving 485 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Leo van de Berg Germany	7	443	417	69	55	44	8	528
Steven J. Nieman United States	7	601 1.4×	567 1.4×	117 1.7×	33 0.6×	31 0.7×	10	675
Kenneth Holmlund Germany	11	665 1.5×	592 1.4×	160 2.3×	67 1.2×	61 1.4×	28	822
Steven Wanzong United States	4	448 1.0×	384 0.9×	101 1.5×	23 0.4×	24 0.5×	4	486
Frederick R. Mosher United States	10	367 0.8×	392 0.9×	45 0.7×	36 0.7×	23 0.5×	23	503
W. E. Shenk United States	13	365 0.8×	339 0.8×	108 1.6×	37 0.7×	47 1.1×	48	507
Catherine Moroney United States	14	689 1.6×	745 1.8×	22 0.3×	38 0.7×	16 0.4×	28	819
Gary S. Wade United States	8	267 0.6×	250 0.6×	72 1.0×	39 0.7×	23 0.5×	20	347
G. Szejwach France	8	273 0.6×	281 0.7×	28 0.4×	34 0.6×	18 0.4×	13	365
James Hocking United Kingdom	10	500 1.1×	454 1.1×	49 0.7×	49 0.9×	15 0.3×	17	580
Kenneth A. Campana United States	9	431 1.0×	434 1.0×	87 1.3×	17 0.3×	14 0.3×	13	532

Countries citing papers authored by Leo van de Berg

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Leo van de Berg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Leo van de Berg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Leo van de Berg more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Leo van de Berg

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Leo van de Berg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Leo van de Berg. The network helps show where Leo van de Berg may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Leo van de Berg

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Leo van de Berg. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Leo van de Berg based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Leo van de Berg. Leo van de Berg is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

1.

Tjemkes, Stephen, et al.. (2001). Calibration of Meteosat water vapor channel observations with independent satellite observations. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres. 106(D6). 5199–5209. 17 indexed citations

2.

Schmetz, Johannes, et al.. (1997). Monitoring deep convection and convective overshooting with METEOSAT. Advances in Space Research. 19(3). 433–441. 187 indexed citations

3.

Schmetz, Johannes, W. Paul Menzel, Christopher S. Velden, et al.. (1995). Monthly Mean Large-Scale Analyses of Upper-Tropospheric Humidity and Wind Field Divergence Derived from Three Geostationary Satellites. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society. 76(9). 1578–1584. 30 indexed citations

4.

Schmetz, Johannes, et al.. (1995). Wind fields and upper tropospheric humidity from satellite images in the 6.3 μm band. Advances in Space Research. 16(10). 69–72. 1 indexed citations

5.

Schmetz, Johannes & Leo van de Berg. (1994). Upper tropospheric humidity observations from Meteosat compared with short‐term forecast fields. Geophysical Research Letters. 21(7). 573–576. 35 indexed citations

6.

Schmetz, Johannes, et al.. (1993). Operational Cloud-Motion Winds from Meteosat Infrared Images. Journal of Applied Meteorology. 32(7). 1206–1225. 227 indexed citations

7.

Berg, Leo van de, et al.. (1991). Monthly mean upper tropospheric humidities in cloud‐free areas from meteosat observations. International Journal of Climatology. 11(8). 819–826. 24 indexed citations

8.

Schmetz, Johannes, et al.. (1990). METEOSAT Observations of Longwave Cloud-Radiative Forcing for April 1985. Journal of Climate. 3(7). 784–791. 7 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact