Leo R. Fedor

56 total papers · 493 total citations
40 papers, 356 citations indexed

About

Leo R. Fedor is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Molecular Biology and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry. According to data from OpenAlex, Leo R. Fedor has authored 40 papers receiving a total of 356 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 36 papers in Organic Chemistry, 13 papers in Molecular Biology and 6 papers in Physical and Theoretical Chemistry. Recurrent topics in Leo R. Fedor's work include Chemical Reaction Mechanisms (17 papers), Chemical Synthesis and Reactions (8 papers) and Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (6 papers). Leo R. Fedor is often cited by papers focused on Chemical Reaction Mechanisms (17 papers), Chemical Synthesis and Reactions (8 papers) and Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (6 papers). Leo R. Fedor collaborates with scholars based in United States. Leo R. Fedor's co-authors include Thomas C. Bruice, J. Katzhendler, Shelly Gurwara, J. McLaughlin, Jerrold Meinwald, Kenneth L. Kirk, Paul A. Lartey, William O. Foye, Charles K. Zercher and James Hilbert and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of the American Chemical Society, The Journal of Physical Chemistry and Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications.

In The Last Decade

Leo R. Fedor

38 papers receiving 294 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Leo R. Fedor 244 137 54 51 28 40 356
Kumar K. Mahalanabis 269 1.1× 83 0.6× 55 1.0× 43 0.8× 27 1.0× 31 396
J. A. Lepoivre 166 0.7× 141 1.0× 47 0.9× 31 0.6× 34 1.2× 37 309
H. Campsteyn 155 0.6× 97 0.7× 40 0.7× 56 1.1× 68 2.4× 26 320
Raquel M. Cravero 217 0.9× 66 0.5× 39 0.7× 52 1.0× 41 1.5× 40 333
A. Lopéz-Castro 277 1.1× 110 0.8× 43 0.8× 34 0.7× 41 1.5× 55 349
Roger Tull 286 1.2× 165 1.2× 46 0.9× 22 0.4× 28 1.0× 27 399
R. Y. Moir 231 0.9× 87 0.6× 119 2.2× 43 0.8× 23 0.8× 38 352
Pl. A. Plattner 177 0.7× 147 1.1× 33 0.6× 47 0.9× 45 1.6× 22 349
Andrew Williams 289 1.2× 179 1.3× 54 1.0× 73 1.4× 24 0.9× 28 391
Henny J. Eggelte 182 0.7× 115 0.8× 21 0.4× 28 0.5× 57 2.0× 36 326

Countries citing papers authored by Leo R. Fedor

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Leo R. Fedor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Leo R. Fedor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Leo R. Fedor more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Leo R. Fedor

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Leo R. Fedor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Leo R. Fedor. The network helps show where Leo R. Fedor may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Leo R. Fedor

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Leo R. Fedor. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Leo R. Fedor based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Leo R. Fedor. Leo R. Fedor is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026