Leo E. Strine

733 citations
53 papers · 318 indexed · h-index 12

Leo E. Strine

40 papers receiving 272 citations

Peers

Leo E. Strine
Comparison fields: 5 of 30
  • Accounting 206
  • Strategy and Management 135
  • Finance 71
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 58
  • Law 32
Replace Iain MacNeil with:
Iain MacNeil United Kingdom
Mariana Pargendler United States
D. Gordon Smith United States
David Millon United States
Martin Gelter United States
David Charny United States
Brett McDonnell United States
Jean-Philippe Robé France
Lawrence E. Mitchell United States
Roberta S. Karmel United States
Leo E. Strine relative to Iain MacNeil United Kingdom Iain MacNeil's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Iain MacNeil · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Leo E. Strine

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Leo E. Strine's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Leo E. Strine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Leo E. Strine more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Leo E. Strine

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Leo E. Strine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Leo E. Strine. The network helps show where Leo E. Strine may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Leo E. Strine, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Leo E. Strine Line = papers co-authored together Leo E. Strine links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1
Lifting Labor’s Voice: A Principled Path Toward Greater Worker Voice And Power Within American Corporate Governance
20212
2
Restoration: The Role Stakeholder Governance Must Play in Recreating a Fair and Sustainable American Economy - A Reply to Professor Rock
20207
3
The Soviet Constitution Problem in Comparative Corporate Law: Testing the Proposition that European Corporate Law is More Stockholder Focused than U.S. Corporate Law
20161
4
Corporate Power is Corporate Purpose II: An Encouragement for Future Consideration from Professors Johnson and Millon
20160
5
Conservative Collision Course: The Tension between Conservative Corporate Law Theory and Citizens United
20154
6
Can we do better by ordinary investors? A pragmatic reaction to the duelling ideological mythologists of corporate law
20140
7
Making it Easier for Directors to 'Do the Right Thing'?
201419
8
Can We Do Better by Ordinary Investors? A Pragmatic Reaction to the Dueling Ideological Mythologists of Corporate Law
201420
9
Documenting the Deal: How Quality Control and Candor Can Improve Boardroom Decision-Making and Reduce the Litigation Target Zone
20142
10
Our Continuing Struggle with the Idea that For-Profit Corporations Seek Profit
201215
11
Delaware Corporate Law and the Model Business Corporation Act: A Study in Symbiosis
20117
12
Loyalty's Core Demand: The Defining Role of Good Faith in Corporation Law
200911
13
Toward Common Sense and Common Ground? Reflections on the Shared Interests of Managers and Labor in a More Rational System of Corporate Governance
200714
14
The Delaware Way: How We Do Corporate Law and Some of the New Challenges We (and Europe) Face
200614
15
Toward a True Corporate Republic: A Traditional Response to Lucian's Solutions for Improving Corporate America
200624
16
The Inescapably Empirical Foundation of the Common Law of Corporations
20031
17
The Social Responsibility of Boards of Directors and Stockholders in Charge of Control Transactions: Is There Any 'There' There?
20021
18
Realigning the Standard of Review of Director Due Care with Delaware Public Policy: A Critique of Van Gorkom and Its Progeny as a Standard of Review Problem
20026
19
Derivative Impact? Some Early Reflections on the Corporation Law Implications of the Enron Debacle
200211
20
Delaware's Corporate-Law System: Is Corporate America Buying an Exquisite Jewel or a Diamond in the Rough? A Response to Kahan & Kamar's Price Discrimination in the Market for Corporate Law
20015

About Leo E. Strine

Leo E. Strine is a scholar working on Law, Accounting, Strategy and Management, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and Finance, having authored 53 papers that have together received 318 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Corporate Insolvency and Governance (20 papers), Corporate Governance and Law (17 papers), Corporate Law and Human Rights (13 papers), Property Rights and Legal Doctrine (11 papers), Legal principles and applications (9 papers), Legal Systems and Judicial Processes (3 papers), Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (2 papers) and Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Accounting (206 citations), Strategy and Management (135 citations), Finance (71 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (58 citations) and Law (32 citations). Leo E. Strine has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include William T. Allen, Nicholas D. Walter, Chris Brummer, Jonathan R. Macey, Eric L. Talley, Jill E. Fisch, David H. Webber, Mark J. Roe, Sean J. Griffith and Bruce Kogut. Their work appears in journals such as ˜The œGeorgetown law journal, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Northwestern University law review, Harvard Law Review and Law and Contemporary Problems.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026