˜The œGeorgetown law journal

255 papers and 1.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 255 papers published in ˜The œGeorgetown law journal in the last decades have received a total of 1.6k indexed citations. Papers published in ˜The œGeorgetown law journal usually cover Law (101 papers), Political Science and International Relations (93 papers) and Economics and Econometrics (88 papers) specifically the topics of Legal Systems and Judicial Processes (55 papers), Legal and Constitutional Studies (48 papers) and Economic Analysis of Law and Legal Systems (32 papers). The most active scholars publishing in ˜The œGeorgetown law journal are Lucian A. Bebchuk, William W. Bratton, Holger Spamann, Lawrence O. Gostin, Ronald J. Mann, Michael Riordan, Joseph F. Brodley, Paul Bolton, John Armour and David S. Law.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in ˜The œGeorgetown law journal

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in ˜The œGeorgetown law journal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in ˜The œGeorgetown law journal.

Countries where authors publish in ˜The œGeorgetown law journal

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in ˜The œGeorgetown law journal. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in ˜The œGeorgetown law journal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites ˜The œGeorgetown law journal more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025