Lenka Piherová
About
In The Last Decade
Lenka Piherová
13 papers receiving 164 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
- Molecular Biology 83
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 64
- Plant Science 39
- Endocrinology 20
- Surgery 18
Countries citing papers authored by Lenka Piherová
This map shows the geographic impact of Lenka Piherová's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lenka Piherová with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lenka Piherová more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Lenka Piherová
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lenka Piherová. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lenka Piherová. The network helps show where Lenka Piherová may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lenka Piherová
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lenka Piherová. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lenka Piherová based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Lenka Piherová. Lenka Piherová is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 9 | |
| 5 | 11 | |
| 6 | 8 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 11 | |
| 9 | 0 | |
| 10 | 6 | |
| 11 | 15 | |
| 12 | 31 | |
| 13 | 22 | |
| 14 | 44 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.