Lekha Pandit
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 2%
- Neurology top 2%
- Rheumatology top 5%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Co-authors
- Amit AgrawalJake TimothyRashmi KundapurSharik MustafaTanuja ChitnisMI LeiteFriedemann PaulNasrin Asgari
- Topics
- Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (36 papers)Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders (24 papers)Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research (17 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONEJournal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
- Partner nations
- IndiaUnited KingdomJapan
In The Last Decade
Lekha Pandit
63 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 707
- Neurology 625
- Rheumatology 255
- Psychiatry and Mental health 219
- Molecular Biology 151
Countries citing papers authored by Lekha Pandit
This map shows the geographic impact of Lekha Pandit's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lekha Pandit with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lekha Pandit more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Lekha Pandit
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lekha Pandit. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lekha Pandit. The network helps show where Lekha Pandit may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lekha Pandit
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lekha Pandit. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lekha Pandit based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Lekha Pandit. Lekha Pandit is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 7 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 13 | |
| 8 | 33 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 8 | |
| 11 | 19 | |
| 12 | 249 | |
| 13 | 21 | |
| 14 | 5 | |
| 15 | 21 | |
| 16 | 43 | |
| 17 | 23 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 13 | |
| 20 | Use of methylation sensitive polymerase chain reaction for detection of fragile X full mutation & carrier state in males. | 5 |
About Lekha Pandit
Lekha Pandit is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Neurology and Rheumatology, having authored 69 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (36 papers), Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders (24 papers) and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research (17 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (625 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (707 citations) and Rheumatology (255 citations). Lekha Pandit has collaborated with scholars based in India, United Kingdom and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Amit Agrawal, Jake Timothy, Rashmi Kundapur, Sharik Mustafa, Tanuja Chitnis, MI Leite, Friedemann Paul, Nasrin Asgari, Metha Apiwattanakul and Ingo Kleiter. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.