Lêda Regis

55 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Lêda Regis
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • Insect Science 807
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 870
  • Parasitology 132
  • Plant Science 634
  • Infectious Diseases 298
Replace Adriana E. Flores with:
Adriana E. Flores Mexico
Richard L. Lampman United States
Narumon Komalamisra Thailand
Constância Flávia Junqueira Ayres Brazil
Maria Alice Varjal de Melo-Santos Brazil
Janet McAllister United States
S.H.P.P. Karunaratne Sri Lanka
José Bento Pereira Lima Brazil
Chamnarn Apiwathnasorn Thailand
André Freire Furtado Brazil
Lêda Regis relative to Adriana E. Flores Mexico Adriana E. Flores's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Adriana E. Flores · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Lêda Regis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lêda Regis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lêda Regis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lêda Regis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lêda Regis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lêda Regis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lêda Regis. The network helps show where Lêda Regis may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Lêda Regis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Lêda Regis Line = papers co-authored together Lêda Regis links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 55 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009147
2 2003138
3 2008118
4 1995101
5 200174
6 201171
7 201366
8 200256
9 199554
10 201346
11 200944
12 201740
13 200038
14 199835
15 199633
16 200731
17 200929
18 200428
19 201428
20 200127

About Lêda Regis

Lêda Regis is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Molecular Biology, Plant Science, Insect Science and Infectious Diseases, having authored 55 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mosquito-borne diseases and control (29 papers), Insect Resistance and Genetics (26 papers), Insect Pest Control Strategies (23 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (10 papers), Malaria Research and Control (8 papers), Parasitic Diseases Research and Treatment (7 papers), Entomopathogenic Microorganisms in Pest Control (6 papers) and Parasite Biology and Host Interactions (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (807 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (870 citations), Parasitology (132 citations), Plant Science (634 citations) and Infectious Diseases (298 citations). Lêda Regis has collaborated with scholars based in Brazil, France and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Maria Alice Varjal de Melo-Santos, Maria Helena Neves Lobo Silva‐Filha, Cláudia Maria Fontes de Oliveira, André Freire Furtado, Jean‐François Charles, Rosângela Maria Rodrigues Barbosa, Wayner Vieira de Souza, Christina Nielsen‐LeRoux, Antônio Miguel Vieira Monteiro and Constância Flávia Junqueira Ayres. Their work appears in journals such as Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Biological Control, Applied and Environmental Microbiology, Acta Tropica and Cadernos de Saúde Pública.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact