Leah Maizey

436 total citations
9 papers, 243 citations indexed

About

Leah Maizey is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Clinical Psychology and Neurology. According to data from OpenAlex, Leah Maizey has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 243 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 3 papers in Clinical Psychology and 2 papers in Neurology. Recurrent topics in Leah Maizey's work include Eating Disorders and Behaviors (3 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (2 papers) and Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (2 papers). Leah Maizey is often cited by papers focused on Eating Disorders and Behaviors (3 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (2 papers) and Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (2 papers). Leah Maizey collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Belgium. Leah Maizey's co-authors include Chris Chambers, Rachel C. Adams, Frederick Verbruggen, Christopher Allen, Natalia Lawrence, Mark G. Stokes, Mark Williams, Anthony T. Barker, Andreas Bungert and Jane Klemen and has published in prestigious journals such as NeuroImage, Journal of Neurophysiology and Nutrients.

In The Last Decade

Leah Maizey

9 papers receiving 242 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Leah Maizey United Kingdom	6	129	88	62	31	26	9	243
Patricia Cirillo Brazil	7	82 0.6×	113 1.3×	60 1.0×	33 1.1×	68 2.6×	10	263
Yuefeng Huang United States	8	134 1.0×	52 0.6×	21 0.3×	29 0.9×	17 0.7×	14	241
Méadhbh Brosnan Australia	11	247 1.9×	45 0.5×	16 0.3×	26 0.8×	65 2.5×	15	366
Aiswarya Laks Nandakumar United States	7	126 1.0×	133 1.5×	67 1.1×	12 0.4×	96 3.7×	9	317
Ulrike Kumpf Germany	8	109 0.8×	181 2.1×	46 0.7×	10 0.3×	65 2.5×	11	225
Damien Ringuenet France	10	193 1.5×	97 1.1×	125 2.0×	17 0.5×	141 5.4×	22	382
Bianca Auschra Switzerland	8	75 0.6×	30 0.3×	43 0.7×	11 0.4×	17 0.7×	19	199
Eileen Lam Canada	6	64 0.5×	104 1.2×	175 2.8×	9 0.3×	34 1.3×	8	266
Piergiorgio Salvan United Kingdom	10	86 0.7×	16 0.2×	27 0.4×	52 1.7×	17 0.7×	16	298
M. Meredith Gillis United States	7	197 1.5×	25 0.3×	42 0.7×	9 0.3×	82 3.2×	8	319

Countries citing papers authored by Leah Maizey

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Leah Maizey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Leah Maizey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Leah Maizey more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Leah Maizey

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Leah Maizey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Leah Maizey. The network helps show where Leah Maizey may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Leah Maizey

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Leah Maizey. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Leah Maizey based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Leah Maizey. Leah Maizey is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Maizey, Leah, et al.. (2022). The Restrain Food Database: validation of an open-source database of foods that should be eaten more or less as part of a healthy diet. Royal Society Open Science. 9(11). 220923–220923. 3 indexed citations

2.

Tzavella, Loukia, Leah Maizey, Andrew D. Lawrence, & Chris Chambers. (2020). The affective priming paradigm as an indirect measure of food attitudes and related choice behaviour. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 27(6). 1397–1415. 6 indexed citations

3.

Maizey, Leah, John Evans, Nils Muhlert, et al.. (2020). Cortical and subcortical functional specificity associated with response inhibition. NeuroImage. 220. 117110–117110. 14 indexed citations

4.

Adams, Rachel C., et al.. (2019). Food Addiction: Implications for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Overeating. Nutrients. 11(9). 2086–2086. 67 indexed citations

5.

Maizey, Leah, Rachel C. Adams, Natalia Lawrence, Frederick Verbruggen, & Chris Chambers. (2018). Cognitive control training as a weight loss tool: An online randomised control trial. Appetite. 130. 310–310. 1 indexed citations

6.

Adams, Rachel C., Leah Maizey, Natalia Lawrence, Frederick Verbruggen, & Chris Chambers. (2018). Cognitive control training to reduce overeating and promote weight loss: A large online randomised controlled trial. Appetite. 123. 467–467. 2 indexed citations

7.

Chambers, Chris, Christopher Allen, Leah Maizey, & Mark Williams. (2012). Is delayed foveal feedback critical for extra-foveal perception?. Cortex. 49(1). 327–335. 43 indexed citations

8.

Maizey, Leah, Christopher Allen, Frederick Verbruggen, et al.. (2012). Comparative incidence rates of mild adverse effects to transcranial magnetic stimulation. Clinical Neurophysiology. 124(3). 536–544. 40 indexed citations

9.

Stokes, Mark G., Anthony T. Barker, Frederick Verbruggen, et al.. (2012). Biophysical determinants of transcranial magnetic stimulation: effects of excitability and depth of targeted area. Journal of Neurophysiology. 109(2). 437–444. 67 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact