Mathijs Franssen
Impact in
- Neurology top 10%
- Vagus Nerve Stimulation Research
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
- Pain Management and Placebo Effect
Papers in
-
- Pain Management and Placebo Effect 5
- EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces 3
- Neural dynamics and brain function 3
-
- Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation 5
- Co-authors
- Johan W.S. Vlaeyen (5 shared papers)Ann Meulders (4 shared papers)Ilse Van Diest (7 shared papers)Andreas von Leupoldt (5 shared papers)Martina D’Agostini (5 shared papers)Andreas M. Burger (4 shared papers)Nathalie Claes (6 shared papers)Mathias Weymar (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Pain (2 papers)Psychophysiology (2 papers)Brain stimulation (2 papers)Journal of Visualized Experiments (2 papers)Cortex (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- BelgiumNetherlandsUnited States
In The Last Decade
Mathijs Franssen
16 papers receiving 267 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
- Neurology 94
- Cognitive Neuroscience 164
- Behavioral Neuroscience 14
- Psychiatry and Mental health 56
- Pharmacology 61
Countries citing papers authored by Mathijs Franssen
This map shows the geographic impact of Mathijs Franssen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mathijs Franssen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mathijs Franssen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mathijs Franssen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mathijs Franssen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mathijs Franssen. The network helps show where Mathijs Franssen may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mathijs Franssen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2016 | 63 | |
| 2 | 2021 | 36 | |
| 3 | 2022 | 35 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 31 | |
| 5 | 2022 | 29 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 18 | |
| 7 | 2010 | 14 | |
| 8 | 2013 | 11 | |
| 9 | 2016 | 9 | |
| 10 | 2020 | 7 | |
| 11 | 2020 | 6 | |
| 12 | 2022 | 4 | |
| 13 | 2017 | 3 | |
| 14 | 2012 | 2 | |
| 15 | 2020 | 2 | |
| 16 | Reinstatement of Pavlovian modulation | 2008 | 1 |
| 17 | 2023 | 0 |
About Mathijs Franssen
Mathijs Franssen is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Pharmacology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Physiology and Neurology, having authored 17 papers that have together received 271 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (5 papers), Pain Management and Placebo Effect (5 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (4 papers), Vagus Nerve Stimulation Research (4 papers), Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (4 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (3 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (3 papers) and Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (94 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (164 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (14 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (56 citations) and Pharmacology (61 citations). Mathijs Franssen has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, Netherlands and United States. Frequent co-authors include Johan W.S. Vlaeyen, Ann Meulders, Ilse Van Diest, Andreas von Leupoldt, Martina D’Agostini, Andreas M. Burger, Nathalie Claes, Mathias Weymar, Lukas Van Oudenhove and Stephan Claes. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Pain, Psychophysiology, Brain stimulation, Journal of Visualized Experiments and Cortex.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.