Lea Kliem

412 total citations
9 papers, 89 citations indexed

About

Lea Kliem is a scholar working on General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Plant Science and Molecular Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, Lea Kliem has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 89 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, 5 papers in Plant Science and 2 papers in Molecular Biology. Recurrent topics in Lea Kliem's work include Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development (5 papers), Organic Food and Agriculture (4 papers) and Agricultural Innovations and Practices (3 papers). Lea Kliem is often cited by papers focused on Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development (5 papers), Organic Food and Agriculture (4 papers) and Agricultural Innovations and Practices (3 papers). Lea Kliem collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Netherlands and France. Lea Kliem's co-authors include Stefanie Sievers-Glotzbach, Anoush Ficiciyan, Armelle Mazé, Johannes Euler, Julian Sagebiel, Marco Verweij and James Hollway and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Rural Studies, Food Policy and International Journal of Consumer Studies.

In The Last Decade

Lea Kliem

9 papers receiving 87 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Lea Kliem Germany	6	54	48	13	13	12	9	89
Norman Siebrecht Germany	3	45 0.8×	40 0.8×	3 0.2×	10 0.8×	27 2.3×	5	115
Jay Cummins Australia	6	120 2.2×	41 0.9×	3 0.2×	6 0.5×	12 1.0×	12	165
M.H. Thijssen Netherlands	8	141 2.6×	95 2.0×	23 1.8×	10 0.8×	5 0.4×	21	236
Daniela Gottschlich Germany	5	26 0.5×	21 0.4×	10 0.8×	35 2.7×	7 0.6×	11	112
Julio Díaz‐José Mexico	6	21 0.4×	38 0.8×	3 0.2×	36 2.8×	13 1.1×	23	123
Perdita Pohle Germany	7	27 0.5×	24 0.5×	5 0.4×	43 3.3×	22 1.8×	11	125
Sugeng Winarso Indonesia	7	63 1.2×	40 0.8×	5 0.4×	3 0.2×	11 0.9×	39	255
Alfio Brandenburg Brazil	7	97 1.8×	91 1.9×	2 0.2×	9 0.7×	11 0.9×	30	209
Masayoshi Shigeta Japan	4	180 3.3×	33 0.7×	30 2.3×	11 0.8×	6 0.5×	7	240
Aditya Hani Indonesia	7	34 0.6×	34 0.7×	6 0.5×	23 1.8×	23 1.9×	44	164

Countries citing papers authored by Lea Kliem

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lea Kliem's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lea Kliem with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lea Kliem more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lea Kliem

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lea Kliem. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lea Kliem. The network helps show where Lea Kliem may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lea Kliem

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lea Kliem. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lea Kliem based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Lea Kliem. Lea Kliem is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Kliem, Lea & Julian Sagebiel. (2023). Consumers' preferences for commons-based and open-source produce: A discrete choice experiment with directional information manipulations. Food Policy. 119. 102501–102501. 4 indexed citations

2.

Kliem, Lea. (2022). Strengthening agroecological resilience through commons-based seed governance in the Philippines. Environment Development and Sustainability. 26(2). 5367–5399. 12 indexed citations

3.

Sievers-Glotzbach, Stefanie, et al.. (2022). The transformative potential of Seed Commons: Applying the social-ecological transformation framework to agri-food systems. Journal of Rural Studies. 97. 290–302. 6 indexed citations

4.

Kliem, Lea, et al.. (2022). How do consumers perceive open‐source seed licenses? Exploring a new credence attribute. International Journal of Consumer Studies. 46(6). 2220–2238. 5 indexed citations

5.

Kliem, Lea & Stefanie Sievers-Glotzbach. (2021). Seeds of resilience: the contribution of commons-based plant breeding and seed production to the social-ecological resilience of the agricultural sector. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability. 20(4). 595–614. 12 indexed citations

6.

Kliem, Lea, et al.. (2021). Welche Rolle spielt die EU‑Agrarpolitik?. Ökologisches Wirtschaften - Fachzeitschrift. 36(4). 16–18. 1 indexed citations

7.

Sievers-Glotzbach, Stefanie, et al.. (2020). Beyond the material: knowledge aspects in seed commoning. Agriculture and Human Values. 38(2). 509–524. 14 indexed citations

8.

Verweij, Marco, et al.. (2020). Four Galore? The Overlap between Mary Douglas’s Grid-Group Typology and Other Highly Cited Social Science Classifications. Sociological Theory. 38(3). 263–294. 4 indexed citations

9.

Sievers-Glotzbach, Stefanie, et al.. (2020). Diverse Seeds – Shared Practices: Conceptualizing Seed Commons. International Journal of the Commons. 14(1). 418–438. 31 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact