Lawrence J. Stricker

111 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Lawrence J. Stricker
Comparison fields: 5 of 119
  • General Decision Sciences 86
  • General Psychology 52
  • Applied Psychology 134
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 302
  • Social Psychology 410
Replace Friedrich Försterling with:
Friedrich Försterling Germany
Elisha Babad Israel
Andy Kukla Canada
James Bieri United States
Benzion Chanowitz United States
J. Sidney Shrauger United States
Ronald Taft Australia
Dean Peabody United States
George Alexander Kelly United States
Harold M. Schroder United States
Lawrence J. Stricker relative to Friedrich Försterling Germany Friedrich Försterling's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Friedrich Försterling · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Lawrence J. Stricker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lawrence J. Stricker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lawrence J. Stricker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lawrence J. Stricker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lawrence J. Stricker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lawrence J. Stricker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lawrence J. Stricker. The network helps show where Lawrence J. Stricker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Lawrence J. Stricker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Lawrence J. Stricker Line = papers co-authored together Lawrence J. Stricker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 120 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004100
2 196792
3 200870
4 199369
5 196768
6 196457
7 196449
8 196345
9 196940
10 198239
11 198837
12 197936
13 196331
14 196229
15 199828
16 199427
17 197426
18 199125
19 199924
20 200824

About Lawrence J. Stricker

Lawrence J. Stricker is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Management Science and Operations Research, Education and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 120 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (24 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (16 papers), Medical Education and Admissions (9 papers), Behavioral and Psychological Studies (9 papers), School Choice and Performance (8 papers), Personality Traits and Psychology (7 papers), Psychological Testing and Assessment (7 papers) and Education, Achievement, and Giftedness (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (86 citations), General Psychology (52 citations), Applied Psychology (134 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (302 citations) and Social Psychology (410 citations). Lawrence J. Stricker has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Donald A. Rock, Douglas N. Jackson, John Ross, William C. Ward, Samuel Messick, Nancy Burton, Andreas Oranje, Yasuyo Sawaki, Philip K. Oltman and David Chan. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Applied Psychology, Educational and Psychological Measurement, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Applied Psychological Measurement and Journal of Applied Social Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact