Laurie Tansman
About
In The Last Decade
Laurie Tansman
3 papers receiving 400 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
- Clinical Biochemistry 319
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 213
- Physiology 104
- Nutrition and Dietetics 74
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 62
Countries citing papers authored by Laurie Tansman
This map shows the geographic impact of Laurie Tansman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Laurie Tansman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Laurie Tansman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Laurie Tansman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Laurie Tansman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Laurie Tansman. The network helps show where Laurie Tansman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Laurie Tansman
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Laurie Tansman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Laurie Tansman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Laurie Tansman. Laurie Tansman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 108 | |
| 2 | 114 | |
| 3 | 183 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.