Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Iterative Weighted Maximum Likelihood Denoising With Probabilistic Patch-Based Weights
2009614 citationsCharles‐Alban Deledalle, Laurent Denis et al.IEEE Transactions on Image Processingprofile →
NL-SAR: A Unified Nonlocal Framework for Resolution-Preserving (Pol)(In)SAR Denoising
2014337 citationsCharles‐Alban Deledalle, Laurent Denis et al.IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensingprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Laurent Denis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Laurent Denis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Laurent Denis more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Laurent Denis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Laurent Denis. The network helps show where Laurent Denis may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Laurent Denis
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Laurent Denis.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Laurent Denis based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Laurent Denis. Laurent Denis is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Denis, Laurent, et al.. (2018). SAR TOMOGRAPHY OF URBAN AREAS: 3D REGULARIZED INVERSION IN THE SCENE GEOMETRY. HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe).1 indexed citations
Захаренко, В. В., А. А. Коноваленко, P. Zarka, et al.. (2012). Search and study of electrostatic discharges in the Solar System with the radio telescope UTR-2. epsc.1 indexed citations
14.
Deledalle, Charles‐Alban, Florence Tupin, & Laurent Denis. (2010). Polarimetric SAR estimation based on non-local means. HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe). 2515–2518.37 indexed citations
15.
Grießmeier, J.‐M., P. Zarka, А. А. Коноваленко, et al.. (2009). Ground-based study of Saturn lightning. EGUGA. 9410.
16.
Deledalle, Charles‐Alban, Laurent Denis, & Florence Tupin. (2009). Iterative Weighted Maximum Likelihood Denoising With Probabilistic Patch-Based Weights. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing. 18(12). 2661–2672.614 indexed citations breakdown →
17.
Goutail, F., Laurent Denis, J. P. Pommereau, Franck Lefèvre, & Carole Deniel. (2001). Ozone loss, NO X and chlorine during the Arctic winter of 1999 - 2000 as reported by SAOZ ground-based, short and long duration balloon flights. 471. 239.1 indexed citations
Denis, Laurent, C. M. Campbell, E. F. Robertson, et al.. (2000). JAZ volume 69 issue 1 Cover and Front matter. Journal of the Australian Mathematical Society Series A Pure Mathematics and Statistics. 69(1). f1–f3.1 indexed citations
20.
Denis, Laurent. (1995). Problème de Lehmer en caractéristique finie. Compositio Mathematica. 98(2). 167–175.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.