This map shows the geographic impact of Laurence Mott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Laurence Mott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Laurence Mott more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Laurence Mott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Laurence Mott. The network helps show where Laurence Mott may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Laurence Mott
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Laurence Mott.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Laurence Mott based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Laurence Mott. Laurence Mott is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
19 of 19 papers shown
1.
Mott, Laurence, et al.. (2007). Optimising the pulping of oil palm empty fruit bunch material. 131–140.3 indexed citations
2.
Groom, Leslie H., Stephen M. Shaler, & Laurence Mott. (2002). Mechanical properties of individual southern pine fibers. Part III. Global relationships between fiber properties and fiber location within an individual tree.. Wood and Fiber Science. 34(2). 238–250.52 indexed citations
3.
Groom, Leslie H., Laurence Mott, & Stephen M. Shaler. (2002). Mechanical properties of individual southern pine fibers. Part I. Determination and variability of stress-strain curves with respect to tree height and juvenility. Wood and Fiber Science. 34(1). 14–27.95 indexed citations
4.
Mott, Laurence, et al.. (2002). Mechanical Properties Of Individual Southern Pine Fibers. Part II. Comparison Of Earlywood And Latewood Fibers With Respect To Tree Height And Juvenility. Wood and Fiber Science. 34(2). 221–237.93 indexed citations
Groom, Leslie H., et al.. (1999). Effect of fiber surface and mechanical properties on the stiffness and strength of medium-density fiberboard.3 indexed citations
Sun, Run‐Cang, Laurence Mott, & J. Bolton. (1998). Fractional and Structural Characterization of Ball Milled and Enzyme Lignins from Oil Palm Empty Fruit Bunch Fiber. Wood and Fiber Science. 30(3). 301–311.9 indexed citations
12.
Shaler, Stephen M., et al.. (1998). Microtomography of cellulosic structures. 89–96.7 indexed citations
Goodell, Barry, et al.. (1997). Decay resistance and microscopic analysis of wood-cement composites. Forest Products Journal. 47(11). 75–80.24 indexed citations
15.
Mott, Laurence, Stephen M. Shaler, & Leslie H. Groom. (1996). A technique to measure strain distributions in single wood pulp fibers. Wood and Fiber Science. 28(4). 429–437.56 indexed citations
16.
Mott, Laurence, et al.. (1995). The tensile testing of individual wood fibers using environmental scanning electron microscopy and video image analysis. TAPPI Journal.35 indexed citations
17.
Shaler, Stephen M., et al.. (1994). Recycled fiber quality from a laboratory-scale blade separator/blender. Forest Products Journal. 44. 47–50.5 indexed citations
Mott, Laurence, et al.. (1955). THE INVESTIGATION OF POROUS MEDIA. PREPARED FROM SPHERICAL METAL POWDER PARTICLES. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information).1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.