Mark Hughes

7.6k total citations · 1 hit paper
165 papers, 5.8k citations indexed

About

Mark Hughes is a scholar working on Building and Construction, Polymers and Plastics and Mechanical Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, Mark Hughes has authored 165 papers receiving a total of 5.8k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 84 papers in Building and Construction, 44 papers in Polymers and Plastics and 27 papers in Mechanical Engineering. Recurrent topics in Mark Hughes's work include Wood Treatment and Properties (67 papers), Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites (39 papers) and Lignin and Wood Chemistry (23 papers). Mark Hughes is often cited by papers focused on Wood Treatment and Properties (67 papers), Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites (39 papers) and Lignin and Wood Chemistry (23 papers). Mark Hughes collaborates with scholars based in Finland, United States and United Kingdom. Mark Hughes's co-authors include Callum A. S. Hill, Lauri Rautkari, Kristiina Laine, Qiuyun Liu, Atsushi Takano, Stefan Winter, Stephen J. Eichhorn, Mindaugas Bulota, Lauri Linkosalmi and Andreja Kutnar and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, JAMA and Journal of Clinical Investigation.

In The Last Decade

Mark Hughes

158 papers receiving 5.6k citations

Hit Papers

Review: Current international research into cellulosic fi... 2001 2026 2009 2017 2001 200 400 600

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mark Hughes Finland 43 2.1k 2.1k 1.3k 1.2k 947 165 5.8k
Liping Cai China 51 2.5k 1.2× 1.1k 0.5× 1.9k 1.5× 1.1k 0.9× 2.3k 2.4× 351 8.4k
Pierre Blanchet Canada 37 1.2k 0.6× 2.1k 1.0× 658 0.5× 602 0.5× 940 1.0× 231 4.5k
G. Wegener Germany 26 585 0.3× 1.5k 0.7× 762 0.6× 423 0.4× 2.1k 2.2× 104 5.0k
Sumin Kim South Korea 59 2.6k 1.2× 2.9k 1.4× 983 0.8× 5.5k 4.7× 1.9k 2.0× 510 12.9k
Narendra Reddy United States 51 3.0k 1.4× 962 0.5× 4.7k 3.7× 482 0.4× 2.0k 2.1× 216 9.1k
Meng Gong China 34 612 0.3× 1.2k 0.6× 282 0.2× 794 0.7× 1.0k 1.1× 233 5.0k
Thomas Bechtold Austria 41 1.4k 0.6× 1.7k 0.8× 1.6k 1.2× 214 0.2× 1.0k 1.1× 280 5.8k
Jiřı́ Militký Czechia 45 3.2k 1.5× 873 0.4× 1.3k 1.0× 1.3k 1.1× 1.7k 1.8× 376 7.6k
Stephen J. Eichhorn United Kingdom 50 3.0k 1.4× 655 0.3× 7.2k 5.7× 1.3k 1.1× 3.4k 3.6× 178 11.4k
Haitao Li China 35 1.8k 0.9× 1.6k 0.8× 212 0.2× 1.7k 1.5× 252 0.3× 280 4.7k

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Hughes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Hughes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Hughes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Hughes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Hughes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Hughes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Hughes. The network helps show where Mark Hughes may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark Hughes

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark Hughes. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark Hughes based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark Hughes. Mark Hughes is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Roy, Satyaki, et al.. (2025). Determining the quantity and quality of wood recovered from building demolitions to enable effective allocation. European Journal of Wood and Wood Products. 83(1). 2 indexed citations
2.
Huuhka, Satu, et al.. (2023). Material inventory dataset for residential buildings in Finland. Data in Brief. 50. 109502–109502. 4 indexed citations
3.
Piccardo, Chiara & Mark Hughes. (2022). Design strategies to increase the reuse of wood materials in buildings: Lessons from architectural practice. Journal of Cleaner Production. 368. 133083–133083. 42 indexed citations
5.
Piccardo, Chiara, et al.. (2021). Estimating the material stock in wooden residential houses in Finland. Waste Management. 135. 318–326. 23 indexed citations
6.
Piccardo, Chiara, Ashraful Alam, & Mark Hughes. (2021). The Potential Contribution of Wood in Green Building Certifications. Lirias (KU Leuven). 5(1). 2 indexed citations
7.
Bulota, Mindaugas, Anne Michud, Kaarlo Nieminen, et al.. (2020). The fiber‐matrix interface in Ioncell cellulose fiber composites and its implications for the mechanical performance. Journal of Applied Polymer Science. 138(17). 5 indexed citations
9.
Bulota, Mindaugas, Anne Michud, Michael Hummel, Mark Hughes, & Herbert Sixta. (2016). The effect of hydration on the micromechanics of regenerated cellulose fibres from ionic liquid solutions of varying draw ratios. Carbohydrate Polymers. 151. 1110–1114. 7 indexed citations
10.
Johansson, Leena‐Sisko, J.M. Campbell, Tuomas Hänninen, et al.. (2012). XPS and the medium‐dependent surface adaptation of cellulose in wood. Surface and Interface Analysis. 44(8). 899–903. 26 indexed citations
11.
Pandey, Krishna K., Mark Hughes, & Tapani Vuorinen. (2010). DIMENSIONAL STABILITY, UV RESISTANCE, AND STATIC MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF SCOTS PINE CHEMICALLY MODIFIED WITH ALKYLENE EPOXIDES. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 2 indexed citations
12.
Pandey, Krishna K., Mark Hughes, & Tapani Vuorinen. (2010). Dimensional stability, UV resistance, and static mechanical properties of Scots pine chemically modified with alkylene expoxides. BioResources. 5(2). 298–615. 10 indexed citations
13.
Greenberg, Frank, et al.. (2005). Williams syndrome in twins. American Journal of Medical Genetics. 37(S6). 97–99. 6 indexed citations
14.
Hughes, Mark. (2004). Olfaction, Emotion, and the Amygdala: arousal-dependent modulation of long-term autobiographical memory and its association with olfaction: beginning to unravel the Proust phenomenon?. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 1 indexed citations
15.
Bennion, Helen, et al.. (2003). Feasibility studies on the restoration needs of four lake SSSIs. Final Report to English Nature, Contract No. EIT 30-05-005. 55. UCL Discovery (University College London). 3 indexed citations
16.
Bruce, Kenneth D. & Mark Hughes. (2000). Terminal Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism Monitoring of Genes Amplified Directly from Bacterial Communities in Soils and Sediments. Molecular Biotechnology. 16(3). 261–270. 14 indexed citations
17.
Abbaszadegan, Mohammad Reza, Jeffery P. Struewing, K M Brown, et al.. (1997). Automated Detection of Prevalent Mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 Genes, Using a Fluorogenic PCR Allelic Discrimination Assay. Genetic Testing. 1(3). 171–180. 13 indexed citations
18.
Dong, Qihan, Andrew Shenker, James Way, et al.. (1995). Molecular Cloning of Human Gαq cDNA and Chromosomal Localization of the Gαq Gene (GNAQ) and a Processed Pseudogene. Genomics. 30(3). 470–475. 27 indexed citations
19.
Chong, Samuel S., Evan E. Eichler, David L. Nelson, & Mark Hughes. (1994). Robust amplification and ethidium‐visible detection of the fragile X syndrome CGG repeat using Pfu polymerase. American Journal of Medical Genetics. 51(4). 522–526. 65 indexed citations
20.
Hughes, Mark, et al.. (1984). Spruce budworm killed balsam fir as a raw material for flakeboard and waferboard. Forest Products Journal. 34(2). 42–46.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026