Laurel Raffington
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health top 10%
- Molecular Biology
- Sociology and Political Science
- Behavioral Neuroscience top 10%
- Clinical Psychology
- Co-authors
- Daniel W. BelskyK. Paige HardenYee Lee ShingElliot M. Tucker–DrobChristine HeimMargherita MalanchiniAttila KeresztesTravis T. Mallard
- Topics
- Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (11 papers)Stress Responses and Cortisol (7 papers)Cognitive Abilities and Testing (7 papers)
- Journals
- PLoS ONEPEDIATRICSChild Development
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Laurel Raffington
27 papers receiving 412 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 125
- Molecular Biology 124
- Sociology and Political Science 79
- Behavioral Neuroscience 69
- Clinical Psychology 64
Countries citing papers authored by Laurel Raffington
This map shows the geographic impact of Laurel Raffington's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Laurel Raffington with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Laurel Raffington more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Laurel Raffington
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Laurel Raffington. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Laurel Raffington. The network helps show where Laurel Raffington may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Laurel Raffington
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Laurel Raffington. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Laurel Raffington based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Laurel Raffington. Laurel Raffington is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 7 | |
| 5 | 7 | |
| 6 | 11 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 16 | |
| 11 | 8 | |
| 12 | 18 | |
| 13 | 5 | |
| 14 | 12 | |
| 15 | 17 | |
| 16 | 7 | |
| 17 | 21 | |
| 18 | 11 | |
| 19 | 10 | |
| 20 | 49 |
About Laurel Raffington
Laurel Raffington is a scholar working on Behavioral Neuroscience, Biological Psychiatry and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 30 papers that have together received 415 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (11 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (7 papers) and Cognitive Abilities and Testing (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (69 citations), Biological Psychiatry (20 citations) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (125 citations). Laurel Raffington has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Daniel W. Belsky, K. Paige Harden, Yee Lee Shing, Elliot M. Tucker–Drob, Christine Heim, Margherita Malanchini, Attila Keresztes, Travis T. Mallard, Meeraj Kothari and John Prindle. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, PEDIATRICS and Child Development.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.