Laurel Fogarty
- Sociology and Political Science top 2%
- Cultural Studies top 0.1%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 5%
- Genetics top 10%
- Co-authors
- Kevin N. LalandLuke RendellMarcus W. FeldmanNicole CreanzaThomas J. H. MorganWilliam HoppittMike WebsterRobert Boyd
- Topics
- Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (21 papers)Language and cultural evolution (20 papers)Evolution and Genetic Dynamics (8 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomGermany
In The Last Decade
Laurel Fogarty
27 papers receiving 1.6k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 123
- Sociology and Political Science 925
- Cultural Studies 635
- Social Psychology 397
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 293
- Genetics 261
Countries citing papers authored by Laurel Fogarty
This map shows the geographic impact of Laurel Fogarty's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Laurel Fogarty with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Laurel Fogarty more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Laurel Fogarty
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Laurel Fogarty. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Laurel Fogarty. The network helps show where Laurel Fogarty may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Laurel Fogarty
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Laurel Fogarty. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Laurel Fogarty based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Laurel Fogarty. Laurel Fogarty is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 11 | |
| 4 | 11 | |
| 5 | 14 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 20 | |
| 8 | 20 | |
| 9 | 18 | |
| 10 | 13 | |
| 11 | 53 | |
| 12 | 28 | |
| 13 | 68 | |
| 14 | 23 | |
| 15 | 54 | |
| 16 | 34 | |
| 17 | 11 | |
| 18 | 97 | |
| 19 | Cognitive culture: theoretical and empirical insights into social learning strategiesbreakdown → | 380 |
| 20 | 87 |
About Laurel Fogarty
Laurel Fogarty is a scholar working on Cultural Studies, Sociology and Political Science and Developmental Biology, having authored 28 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (21 papers), Language and cultural evolution (20 papers) and Evolution and Genetic Dynamics (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cultural Studies (635 citations), Developmental Biology (134 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (925 citations). Laurel Fogarty has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Kevin N. Laland, Luke Rendell, Marcus W. Feldman, Nicole Creanza, Thomas J. H. Morgan, William Hoppitt, Mike Webster, Robert Boyd, Magnus Enquist and Kimmo Eriksson. Their work appears in journals such as Science, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.