Laura J. Moriarty
- Health top 5%
- Intimate Partner and Family Violence 5
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending 4
-
- Crime Patterns and Interventions 11
- Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis 8
- Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment 3
- Gender Studies top 10%
- Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies 2
-
- Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies 4
-
- Evaluation of Teaching Practices 2
- Co-authors
- Stephen D. GottfredsonJill A. GordonJ. E. WilliamsDavid L. CarterHelen EigenbergMelissa GrossElizabeth P. CramerPatrick Anderson
- Journals
- PEDIATRICS (1 paper)Journal of Interpersonal Violence (1 paper)Aggression and Violent Behavior (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesGhanaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Laura J. Moriarty
28 papers receiving 535 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
- Health 129
- Clinical Psychology 277
- Sociology and Political Science 458
- Gender Studies 61
- General Health Professions 69
Countries citing papers authored by Laura J. Moriarty
This map shows the geographic impact of Laura J. Moriarty's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Laura J. Moriarty with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Laura J. Moriarty more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Laura J. Moriarty
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Laura J. Moriarty. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Laura J. Moriarty. The network helps show where Laura J. Moriarty may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 14 scholars most cited alongside Laura J. Moriarty, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2023 | 3 | |
| 2 | 2009 | 38 | |
| 3 | 2008 | 39 | |
| 4 | 2008 | 22 | |
| 5 | 2008 | 10 | |
| 6 | 2008 | 1 | |
| 7 | 2007 | 48 | |
| 8 | Clinical Versus Actuarial Judgments in Criminal Justice Decisions: Should One Replace the Other? | 2006 | 19 |
| 9 | 2006 | 19 | |
| 10 | 2005 | 6 | |
| 11 | Criminal Justice Technology In The 21st Century | 2005 | 20 |
| 12 | 2005 | 150 | |
| 13 | 2003 | 30 | |
| 14 | 2000 | 12 | |
| 15 | 1999 | 0 | |
| 16 | 1995 | 5 | |
| 17 | 1995 | 0 | |
| 18 | 1992 | 1 | |
| 19 | 1992 | 2 | |
| 20 | 1991 | 9 |
About Laura J. Moriarty
Laura J. Moriarty is a scholar working on Health, Sociology and Political Science and Clinical Psychology, having authored 30 papers that have together received 585 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Crime Patterns and Interventions (11 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (8 papers), Intimate Partner and Family Violence (5 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (4 papers), Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies (4 papers), Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment (3 papers), Evaluation of Teaching Practices (2 papers) and Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (129 citations), Clinical Psychology (277 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (458 citations). Laura J. Moriarty has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Ghana and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Stephen D. Gottfredson, Jill A. Gordon, J. E. Williams, David L. Carter, Helen Eigenberg, Melissa Gross, Elizabeth P. Cramer, Patrick Anderson, William V. Pelfrey and Matthew A. Eisenberg. Their work appears in journals such as PEDIATRICS, Journal of Interpersonal Violence and Aggression and Violent Behavior.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.