Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The need for a complex systems model of evidence for public health
2017711 citationsHarry Rutter, Natalie Savona et al.The Lancetprofile →
Citations per year, relative to Laura Harper Laura Harper (= 1×)
peers
Michael V. Hayes
Countries citing papers authored by Laura Harper
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Laura Harper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Laura Harper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Laura Harper more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Laura Harper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Laura Harper. The network helps show where Laura Harper may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Laura Harper
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Laura Harper.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Laura Harper based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Laura Harper. Laura Harper is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
11 of 11 papers shown
1.
Ginsburg, Alexander, et al.. (2021). A big white dot after CPR. International Journal of Emergency Medicine. 14(1). 51–51.
2.
Harper, Laura, et al.. (2017). Brief Communication: Assessing the current value of milk, meat and fibre products from the goat industry in New Zealand. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production. 77. 173–176.1 indexed citations
3.
Rutter, Harry, Natalie Savona, Ketevan Glonti, et al.. (2017). The need for a complex systems model of evidence for public health. The Lancet. 390(10112). 2602–2604.711 indexed citations breakdown →
Harper, Laura. (1986). Pangan, gizi dan pertanian / Laura J. Harper, Brady J. Deaton, Judi A. Driskel; Suhardjo. 1986(1986). 1–99.1 indexed citations
9.
Harper, Laura, et al.. (1986). Pangan, gizi dan pertanian.35 indexed citations
10.
Harper, Laura. (1986). Pangan, gizi dan pertanian / Laura J. Harper, Brady J. Deaton, Judy A. Driskel; penerjemah Suhardjo. 1986(1986). 1–99.2 indexed citations
11.
Harper, Laura. (1985). Pangan, gizi dan pertanian / Laura J. Harper, Brady J. Deaton, and Judy A. Driskel; penterjemah Suhardjo. 1985(1985). 1–99.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.