Laura Booth
- Oncology top 5%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 5%
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health top 5%
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Economics and Econometrics top 5%
- Co-authors
- Galina VelikovaPeter J. SelbyAdam B. SmithJulia BrownPaul BrownPamela LynchPenny WrightClare Harley
- Topics
- Cancer survivorship and care (5 papers)Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (4 papers)Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (3 papers)
- Cited by
- OncologyPediatrics, Perinatology and Child HealthPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesJournal of Clinical OncologyBritish Journal of Cancer
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustraliaGermany
In The Last Decade
Laura Booth
9 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
- Oncology 860
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 512
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 368
- General Health Professions 356
- Economics and Econometrics 199
Countries citing papers authored by Laura Booth
This map shows the geographic impact of Laura Booth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Laura Booth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Laura Booth more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Laura Booth
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Laura Booth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Laura Booth. The network helps show where Laura Booth may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Laura Booth
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Laura Booth. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Laura Booth based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Laura Booth. Laura Booth is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 19 | |
| 4 | 135 | |
| 5 | 18 | |
| 6 | 68 | |
| 7 | 35 | |
| 8 | 51 | |
| 9 | Measuring Quality of Life in Routine Oncology Practice Improves Communication and Patient Well-Being: A Randomized Controlled Trialbreakdown → | 1067 |
About Laura Booth
Laura Booth is a scholar working on Oncology, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology and General Health Professions, having authored 9 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer survivorship and care (5 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (4 papers) and Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (860 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (368 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (512 citations). Laura Booth has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Galina Velikova, Peter J. Selby, Adam B. Smith, Julia Brown, Paul Brown, Pamela Lynch, Penny Wright, Clare Harley, Jenny Hewison and Sally-Ann Clarke. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of Clinical Oncology and British Journal of Cancer.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.