Laura Booth

6.4k total citations · 1 hit paper
9 papers, 1.4k citations indexed

About

Laura Booth is a scholar working on Oncology, General Health Professions and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Laura Booth has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 1.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Oncology, 4 papers in General Health Professions and 3 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in Laura Booth's work include Cancer survivorship and care (5 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (4 papers) and Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (3 papers). Laura Booth is often cited by papers focused on Cancer survivorship and care (5 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (4 papers) and Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (3 papers). Laura Booth collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Germany. Laura Booth's co-authors include Galina Velikova, Peter J. Selby, Adam B. Smith, Julia Brown, Paul Brown, Pamela Lynch, Penny Wright, Clare Harley, Jenny Hewison and Sally-Ann Clarke and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of Clinical Oncology and British Journal of Cancer.

In The Last Decade

Laura Booth

9 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Hit Papers

Measuring Quality of Life in Routine Oncology Practice Im... 2004 2026 2011 2018 2004 250 500 750 1000

Peers

Laura Booth
Pamela Lynch United Kingdom
Susan Catt United Kingdom
Kate Absolom United Kingdom
Hilary Plant United Kingdom
Manali I. Patel United States
Dorothy Dulko United States
Erin E. Hahn United States
Kelly Kenzik United States
Pamela Lynch United Kingdom
Laura Booth
Citations per year, relative to Laura Booth Laura Booth (= 1×) peers Pamela Lynch

Countries citing papers authored by Laura Booth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Laura Booth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Laura Booth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Laura Booth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Laura Booth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Laura Booth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Laura Booth. The network helps show where Laura Booth may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Laura Booth

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Laura Booth. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Laura Booth based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Laura Booth. Laura Booth is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Ellison, Stuart, Aiyin Liao, Hélène F.E. Gleitz, et al.. (2023). Sustained long-term disease correction in a murine model of MPSII following stem cell gene therapy. Molecular Therapy — Methods & Clinical Development. 31. 101127–101127. 5 indexed citations
2.
McDonald, Julie, et al.. (2023). Qualitative evaluation of an integrated respiratory and palliative care service: patient, caregiver and general practitioner perspectives. Australian Health Review. 47(4). 463–471. 2 indexed citations
3.
McHarg, Selina, Laura Booth, Rahat Perveen, et al.. (2022). Mast cell infiltration of the choroid and protease release are early events in age-related macular degeneration associated with genetic risk at both chromosomes 1q32 and 10q26. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 119(20). e2118510119–e2118510119. 19 indexed citations
4.
Velikova, Galina, Ada Keding, Clare Harley, et al.. (2010). Patients report improvements in continuity of care when quality of life assessments are used routinely in oncology practice: Secondary outcomes of a randomised controlled trial. European Journal of Cancer. 46(13). 2381–2388. 135 indexed citations
5.
Harley, Clare, Jacqui Adams, Laura Booth, et al.. (2009). Patient Experiences of Continuity of Cancer Care: Development of a New Medical Care Questionnaire (MCQ) for Oncology Outpatients. Value in Health. 12(8). 1180–1186. 18 indexed citations
6.
Clarke, Sally-Ann, Laura Booth, Galina Velikova, & Jenny Hewison. (2006). Social Support. Cancer Nursing. 29(1). 66–72. 68 indexed citations
7.
Wright, Penny, Adam B. Smith, Laura Booth, et al.. (2005). Psychosocial difficulties, deprivation and cancer: three questionnaire studies involving 609 cancer patients. British Journal of Cancer. 93(6). 622–626. 35 indexed citations
8.
Velikova, Galina, Laura Booth, C. Johnston, D Forman, & Peter J. Selby. (2004). Breast cancer outcomes in South Asian population of West Yorkshire. British Journal of Cancer. 90(10). 1926–1932. 51 indexed citations
9.
Velikova, Galina, Laura Booth, Adam B. Smith, et al.. (2004). Measuring Quality of Life in Routine Oncology Practice Improves Communication and Patient Well-Being: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 22(4). 714–724. 1067 indexed citations breakdown →

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026