Lapo Filistrucchi
- Strategy and Management top 5%
- Marketing top 5%
- Economics and Econometrics top 5%
- Media Technology top 2%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Co-authors
- Elena ArgentesiEric van DammeDamien GéradinTobias J. KleinJens PrüferFatih Cemil ÖzbuğdayJan BooneErik Brouwer
- Topics
- Digital Platforms and Economics (19 papers)Merger and Competition Analysis (18 papers)ICT Impact and Policies (10 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Applied EconometricsInformation Economics and PolicyJournal of Competition Law & Economics
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsItalyGermany
In The Last Decade
Lapo Filistrucchi
25 papers receiving 387 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
- Strategy and Management 355
- Marketing 252
- Economics and Econometrics 184
- Media Technology 139
- Sociology and Political Science 70
Countries citing papers authored by Lapo Filistrucchi
This map shows the geographic impact of Lapo Filistrucchi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lapo Filistrucchi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lapo Filistrucchi more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Lapo Filistrucchi
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lapo Filistrucchi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lapo Filistrucchi. The network helps show where Lapo Filistrucchi may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lapo Filistrucchi
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lapo Filistrucchi. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lapo Filistrucchi based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Lapo Filistrucchi. Lapo Filistrucchi is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 22 | |
| 3 | 14 | |
| 4 | 7 | |
| 5 | 36 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 21 | |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | REGULATING ONE SIDE OF A TWO-SIDED MARKET: THE FRENCH ADVERTISING BAN ON PRIME-TIME STATE TELEVISION | 1 |
| 12 | Relaxing Competition through Product Innovation | 3 |
| 13 | 13 | |
| 14 | Mergers in Two-Sided Markets - A Report to the NMa | 8 |
| 15 | How many markets are two-sided? | 5 |
| 16 | 8 | |
| 17 | 5 | |
| 18 | 23 | |
| 19 | 143 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About Lapo Filistrucchi
Lapo Filistrucchi is a scholar working on Strategy and Management, Marketing and Media Technology, having authored 26 papers that have together received 432 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Platforms and Economics (19 papers), Merger and Competition Analysis (18 papers) and ICT Impact and Policies (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Marketing (252 citations), Strategy and Management (355 citations) and Media Technology (139 citations). Lapo Filistrucchi has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Italy and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Elena Argentesi, Eric van Damme, Damien Géradin, Tobias J. Klein, Jens Prüfer, Fatih Cemil Özbuğday, Jan Boone, Erik Brouwer, E.E.C. van Damme and Catherine E. Tucker. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Applied Econometrics, Information Economics and Policy and Journal of Competition Law & Economics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.