Lanice R. Avery

547 total citations
19 papers, 332 citations indexed

About

Lanice R. Avery is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Social Psychology and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Lanice R. Avery has authored 19 papers receiving a total of 332 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Gender Studies, 8 papers in Social Psychology and 8 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in Lanice R. Avery's work include Gender, Feminism, and Media (10 papers), Gender Roles and Identity Studies (6 papers) and Racial and Ethnic Identity Research (4 papers). Lanice R. Avery is often cited by papers focused on Gender, Feminism, and Media (10 papers), Gender Roles and Identity Studies (6 papers) and Racial and Ethnic Identity Research (4 papers). Lanice R. Avery collaborates with scholars based in United States. Lanice R. Avery's co-authors include L. Monique Ward, Morgan C. Jerald, Elizabeth R. Cole, Katherine L. Goldey, Kevin Goodman, Sari M. van Anders, Sarah L. Trinh, Donte L. Bernard, Jasmine A. Abrams and Alexandrea R. Golden and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Counseling Psychology, Journal of Social Issues and Sex Roles.

In The Last Decade

Lanice R. Avery

18 papers receiving 324 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Lanice R. Avery United States 9 154 153 123 82 55 19 332
Margaret C. Stevenson United States 12 211 1.4× 98 0.6× 231 1.9× 87 1.1× 44 0.8× 34 441
Michael N. Awad United States 4 252 1.6× 85 0.6× 152 1.2× 110 1.3× 60 1.1× 7 409
Petal Grower United States 8 80 0.5× 155 1.0× 115 0.9× 26 0.3× 30 0.5× 17 267
Analia F. Albuja United States 12 210 1.4× 50 0.3× 88 0.7× 123 1.5× 30 0.5× 25 333
Cory L. Pedersen Canada 10 113 0.7× 201 1.3× 158 1.3× 60 0.7× 8 0.1× 38 322
Julie Sriken United States 8 312 2.0× 62 0.4× 198 1.6× 105 1.3× 47 0.9× 18 477
Eva Aizpurúa Ireland 10 209 1.4× 90 0.6× 161 1.3× 47 0.6× 82 1.5× 51 390
Sarah E. Conlin United States 11 116 0.8× 83 0.5× 93 0.8× 150 1.8× 74 1.3× 16 343
Liam Wignall United Kingdom 13 246 1.6× 244 1.6× 281 2.3× 156 1.9× 43 0.8× 31 473
Danielle Dirks United States 7 130 0.8× 113 0.7× 250 2.0× 80 1.0× 21 0.4× 12 391

Countries citing papers authored by Lanice R. Avery

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lanice R. Avery's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lanice R. Avery with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lanice R. Avery more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lanice R. Avery

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lanice R. Avery. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lanice R. Avery. The network helps show where Lanice R. Avery may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lanice R. Avery

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lanice R. Avery. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lanice R. Avery based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Lanice R. Avery. Lanice R. Avery is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
1.
Debnam, Katrina J., Lanice R. Avery, & K. A. Lynch. (2024). More Than a Woman: A Scoping Review of the Role of the Strong Black Woman Schema in Black Women’s Romantic Relationships. Trauma Violence & Abuse. 27(2). 294–304. 1 indexed citations
2.
Volpe, Vanessa V., et al.. (2024). Young Black American Women’s Social Media Use and Online Victimization. Social Media + Society. 10(3).
3.
Avery, Lanice R., et al.. (2023). Black sexual minority women’s Internalized stigma and coping motivated alcohol use: the role of emotional suppression. Journal of Ethnicity in Substance Abuse. 24(2). 433–449. 1 indexed citations
4.
Jerald, Morgan C., et al.. (2023). Revisiting Self-Objectification Among Black Women: The Importance of Eurocentric Beauty Norms. Journal of Black Psychology. 49(6). 868–896. 4 indexed citations
5.
Avery, Lanice R., et al.. (2023). Black Women’s Social Media Use Integration and Social Media Addiction. Social Media + Society. 9(1). 5 indexed citations
6.
Avery, Lanice R., et al.. (2022). The Strong, Silent (Gender) Type: The Strong Black Woman Ideal, Self-Silencing, and Sexual Assertiveness in Black College Women. Archives of Sexual Behavior. 51(3). 1509–1520. 7 indexed citations
7.
Jamison, Laura, et al.. (2022). Gendered Racial Microaggressions Scale: Measurement Invariance Across Sexual Orientation. Psychology of Women Quarterly. 46(4). 518–530. 6 indexed citations
8.
Avery, Lanice R., et al.. (2022). Black women’s experiences of gendered racial sexual objectification, body image, and depressive symptoms. Body Image. 41. 443–452. 13 indexed citations
9.
Avery, Lanice R., et al.. (2022). Online Victimization, Womanism, and Body Esteem among Young Black Women: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach. Sex Roles. 86(11-12). 681–694. 7 indexed citations
10.
Avery, Lanice R., et al.. (2021). “Pretty hurts”: Acceptance of hegemonic feminine beauty ideals and reduced sexual well-being among Black women. Body Image. 38. 181–190. 17 indexed citations
11.
Avery, Lanice R., et al.. (2021). Remixing the Script? Associations Between Black-Oriented Media Consumption and Black Women’s Heteropatriarchal Romantic Relationship Beliefs. Journal of Black Psychology. 47(7). 593–625. 4 indexed citations
12.
Anyiwo, Nkemka, et al.. (2021). Becoming Strong: Sociocultural Experiences, Mental Health, & Black Girls' Strong Black Woman Schema Endorsement. Journal of Research on Adolescence. 32(1). 89–98. 11 indexed citations
13.
Avery, Lanice R., et al.. (2020). Subverting the Mandates of Our Methods: Tensions and Considerations for Incorporating Reproductive Justice Frameworks into Psychological Science. Journal of Social Issues. 76(2). 447–455. 6 indexed citations
14.
Ward, L. Monique, Morgan C. Jerald, Lanice R. Avery, & Elizabeth R. Cole. (2019). Following Their Lead? Connecting Mainstream Media Use to Black Women’s Gender Beliefs and Sexual Agency. The Journal of Sex Research. 57(2). 200–212. 36 indexed citations
15.
Jerald, Morgan C., Elizabeth R. Cole, L. Monique Ward, & Lanice R. Avery. (2017). Controlling images: How awareness of group stereotypes affects Black women’s well-being.. Journal of Counseling Psychology. 64(5). 487–499. 88 indexed citations
16.
Jerald, Morgan C., et al.. (2017). Social Media Contributions to Strong Black Woman Ideal Endorsement and Black Women’s Mental Health. Psychology of Women Quarterly. 41(4). 465–478. 64 indexed citations
17.
Avery, Lanice R., et al.. (2016). Tuning Gender. Journal of Black Psychology. 43(2). 159–191. 13 indexed citations
18.
Goldey, Katherine L., Lanice R. Avery, & Sari M. van Anders. (2013). Sexual Fantasies and Gender/Sex: A Multimethod Approach with Quantitative Content Analysis and Hormonal Responses. The Journal of Sex Research. 51(8). 917–931. 22 indexed citations
19.
Cole, Elizabeth R., et al.. (2012). Against Nature: How Arguments about the Naturalness of Marriage Privilege Heterosexuality. Journal of Social Issues. 68(1). 46–62. 27 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026