Lane M. Smith

55 papers receiving 611 citations

Peers

Lane M. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 22
  • Insect Science 75
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 77
  • Transplantation 11
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 25
Replace E Lévy with:
E Lévy Israel
Ester Antón Spain
Jean‐Daniel Graf Switzerland
Romain Pariaut United States
Fábio Bucaretchi Brazil
Kent R. Refsal United States
Pilar Suñé Spain
Ronald S. Walls Australia
William C. Edwards United States
Gilly Griffin Canada
Lane M. Smith relative to E Lévy Israel E Lévy's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×12.5×
E Lévy · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Lane M. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lane M. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lane M. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lane M. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lane M. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lane M. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lane M. Smith. The network helps show where Lane M. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Lane M. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Lane M. Smith Line = papers co-authored together Lane M. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 55 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202186
2 201846
3 202037
4 198436
5
Lesser Prairie-Chicken nest site selection and vegetation characteristics in tebuthiuron-treated and untreated sand shinnery oak in Texas
198929
6 200229
7 200228
8 202121
9 199921
10 202019
11 201819
12 201918
13 201817
14 201516
15 202016
16 200414
17 201613
18 201810
19 199510
20 19999

About Lane M. Smith

Lane M. Smith is a scholar working on Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Genetics, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Insect Science and Plant Science, having authored 55 papers that have together received 651 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insects and Parasite Interactions (15 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (14 papers), Plant and animal studies (5 papers), Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (5 papers), Insect Pest Control Strategies (4 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (4 papers), Hemiptera Insect Studies (4 papers) and Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (22 citations), Insect Science (75 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (77 citations), Transplantation (11 citations) and Obstetrics and Gynecology (25 citations). Lane M. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Norway and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Arthur G. Appel, Loke T. Kok, David A. Haukos, Roland N. Pittman, Paul Lephart, Daniel Kaul, Joshua G. Petrie, D. Lyu, Liliya M. Yamaleyeva and Aleksander S. Golub. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Economic Entomology, Environmental Entomology, Shock, The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact