L. Tai

2.2k total citations · 1 hit paper
6 papers, 863 citations indexed

About

L. Tai is a scholar working on Neurology, Speech and Hearing and Epidemiology. According to data from OpenAlex, L. Tai has authored 6 papers receiving a total of 863 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Neurology, 1 paper in Speech and Hearing and 1 paper in Epidemiology. Recurrent topics in L. Tai's work include Intracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research (4 papers), Neurosurgical Procedures and Complications (4 papers) and Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (3 papers). L. Tai is often cited by papers focused on Intracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research (4 papers), Neurosurgical Procedures and Complications (4 papers) and Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (3 papers). L. Tai collaborates with scholars based in China, United States and Australia. L. Tai's co-authors include Hisatomi Arima, Jian Jiang, En Xu, Mark Parsons, Emma Heeley, Lewis B. Morgenstern, John Chalmers, Craig S. Anderson, Qingyun Tao and Bin Peng and has published in prestigious journals such as Neurology, Stroke and The Lancet Neurology.

In The Last Decade

L. Tai

5 papers receiving 838 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Intensive blood pressure reduction in acute cerebral haemorrhage trial (INTERACT): a randomised pilot trial

2008 504 citations Craig S. Anderson, Yining Huang et al. The Lancet Neurology profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
L. Tai China	5	781	610	78	46	43	6	863
Christian Skulina Australia	5	782 1.0×	610 1.0×	78 1.0×	51 1.1×	40 0.9×	5	865
Qingyun Tao China	4	780 1.0×	610 1.0×	78 1.0×	43 0.9×	38 0.9×	7	857
Markus Beitzke Austria	9	171 0.2×	142 0.2×	48 0.6×	40 0.9×	56 1.3×	16	307
Thierry Crépin-Leblond France	6	195 0.2×	322 0.5×	54 0.7×	17 0.4×	198 4.6×	11	429
Martina Goeldlin Switzerland	12	188 0.2×	309 0.5×	79 1.0×	31 0.7×	113 2.6×	28	420
Johan Rådberg Sweden	4	225 0.3×	353 0.6×	68 0.9×	12 0.3×	69 1.6×	5	470
Eijirou Tanaka Japan	8	181 0.2×	184 0.3×	50 0.6×	14 0.3×	42 1.0×	26	277
Else Charlotte Sandset Norway	3	155 0.2×	278 0.5×	170 2.2×	11 0.2×	123 2.9×	3	373
Fumio Miyashita Japan	13	203 0.3×	257 0.4×	72 0.9×	7 0.2×	35 0.8×	30	401
Estela Sanjuán Spain	10	272 0.3×	403 0.7×	39 0.5×	30 0.7×	148 3.4×	21	492

Countries citing papers authored by L. Tai

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of L. Tai's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by L. Tai with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites L. Tai more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by L. Tai

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by L. Tai. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by L. Tai. The network helps show where L. Tai may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of L. Tai

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of L. Tai. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of L. Tai based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with L. Tai. L. Tai is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

6 of 6 papers shown

1.

Zhu, Yifang, et al.. (2025). Development and application of organelle gene editing technology in angiosperms. Chinese Science Bulletin (Chinese Version).

2.

Lai, Xinxing, et al.. (2017). Effects of extended in-patient treatment training on outcome of post-stroke dysphagia.. PubMed. 21(24). 5711–5716. 8 indexed citations

3.

Anderson, Craig S., Yining Huang, Hisatomi Arima, et al.. (2010). Effects of Early Intensive Blood Pressure-Lowering Treatment on the Growth of Hematoma and Perihematomal Edema in Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage. Stroke. 41(2). 307–312. 168 indexed citations

4.

Arima, Hisatomi, Craig S. Anderson, Ji Guang Wang, et al.. (2010). Lower Treatment Blood Pressure Is Associated With Greatest Reduction in Hematoma Growth After Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage. Hypertension. 56(5). 852–858. 52 indexed citations

5.

Arima, Hisatomi, Yongwei Huang, Emma Heeley, et al.. (2009). Significance of perihematomal edema in acute intracerebral hemorrhage. Neurology. 73(23). 1963–1968. 131 indexed citations

6.

Anderson, Craig S., Yining Huang, Ji Guang Wang, et al.. (2008). Intensive blood pressure reduction in acute cerebral haemorrhage trial (INTERACT): a randomised pilot trial. The Lancet Neurology. 7(5). 391–399. 504 indexed citations breakdown →

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact