L. Prokhorov

85.8k total citations
22 papers, 103 citations indexed

About

L. Prokhorov is a scholar working on Ocean Engineering, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. According to data from OpenAlex, L. Prokhorov has authored 22 papers receiving a total of 103 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 17 papers in Ocean Engineering, 12 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics and 12 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. Recurrent topics in L. Prokhorov's work include Geophysics and Sensor Technology (17 papers), Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (12 papers) and Mechanical and Optical Resonators (8 papers). L. Prokhorov is often cited by papers focused on Geophysics and Sensor Technology (17 papers), Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (12 papers) and Mechanical and Optical Resonators (8 papers). L. Prokhorov collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Russia and United States. L. Prokhorov's co-authors include V. P. Mitrofanov, V. P. Mitrofanov, K. V. Tokmakov, S. J. Cooper, John Bryant, A. S. Ubhi, D. Hoyland, Д. В. Мартынов, P. A. Willems and S. E. Strigin and has published in prestigious journals such as Applied Physics Letters, Physics Letters A and Review of Scientific Instruments.

In The Last Decade

L. Prokhorov

17 papers receiving 89 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
L. Prokhorov United Kingdom 8 64 50 42 32 11 22 103
A. Heptonstall United Kingdom 3 55 0.9× 39 0.8× 48 1.1× 21 0.7× 12 1.1× 3 95
R. Jones United Kingdom 7 70 1.1× 56 1.1× 34 0.8× 41 1.3× 18 1.6× 9 113
A. Cumming United Kingdom 8 92 1.4× 63 1.3× 64 1.5× 43 1.3× 28 2.5× 14 144
J. A. Giaime United States 6 87 1.4× 70 1.4× 52 1.2× 39 1.2× 9 0.8× 9 129
J. V. van Heijningen Netherlands 7 61 1.0× 35 0.7× 37 0.9× 25 0.8× 10 0.9× 17 90
S. P. Vyatchanin Russia 6 80 1.3× 67 1.3× 70 1.7× 21 0.7× 18 1.6× 9 113
M. Doets Netherlands 6 35 0.5× 29 0.6× 30 0.7× 27 0.8× 6 0.5× 14 86
K. Kokeyama Japan 7 102 1.6× 69 1.4× 131 3.1× 16 0.5× 19 1.7× 21 174
J. Heefner United States 6 83 1.3× 66 1.3× 109 2.6× 17 0.5× 18 1.6× 14 145
S. H. Huttner United Kingdom 6 83 1.3× 53 1.1× 84 2.0× 21 0.7× 20 1.8× 12 125

Countries citing papers authored by L. Prokhorov

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of L. Prokhorov's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by L. Prokhorov with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites L. Prokhorov more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by L. Prokhorov

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by L. Prokhorov. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by L. Prokhorov. The network helps show where L. Prokhorov may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of L. Prokhorov

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of L. Prokhorov. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of L. Prokhorov based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with L. Prokhorov. L. Prokhorov is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Mitchell, A. L., J. Lehmann, S. J. Cooper, et al.. (2025). Integration of high-performance compact interferometric sensors in a suspended interferometer. Classical and Quantum Gravity. 42(19). 195014–195014.
2.
Prokhorov, L., J. Smetana, Vincent Boyer, et al.. (2025). First result for testing semiclassical gravity effect with a torsion balance. Physical review. D. 111(8).
3.
Smetana, J., A. S. Ubhi, L. Prokhorov, et al.. (2025). Sensitivity and control of a six-axis fused-silica seismometer. Physical Review Applied. 23(2).
4.
Prokhorov, L., S. J. Cooper, A. S. Ubhi, et al.. (2024). Design and sensitivity of a 6-axis seismometer for gravitational wave observatories. Physical review. D. 109(4). 6 indexed citations
5.
Dongen, J. van, L. Prokhorov, S. J. Cooper, et al.. (2023). Reducing control noise in gravitational wave detectors with interferometric local damping of suspended optics. Review of Scientific Instruments. 94(5). 5 indexed citations
6.
Fronzo, C. Di, N. A. Holland, A. L. Mitchell, et al.. (2023). Laser frequency stabilization with the use of homodyne quadrature interferometers. Classical and Quantum Gravity. 41(6). 65010–65010. 1 indexed citations
7.
Ubhi, A. S., L. Prokhorov, S. J. Cooper, et al.. (2022). Active platform stabilization with a 6D seismometer. Applied Physics Letters. 121(17). 8 indexed citations
8.
Prokhorov, L., et al.. (2022). Using silicon disk resonators to measure mechanical losses caused by an electric field. Review of Scientific Instruments. 93(1). 14501–14501.
9.
Ubhi, A. S., J. Smetana, Teng Zhang, et al.. (2021). A six degree-of-freedom fused silica seismometer: design and tests of a metal prototype. Classical and Quantum Gravity. 39(1). 15006–15006. 11 indexed citations
10.
Prokhorov, L., et al.. (2020). Temperature Dependence of Losses in Mechanical Resonator Fabricated via the Direct Bonding of Silicon Strips. Semiconductors. 54(1). 117–121. 1 indexed citations
11.
Prokhorov, L., V. P. Mitrofanov, Brittany Kamai, et al.. (2019). Measurement of mechanical losses in the carbon nanotube black coating of silicon wafers. Classical and Quantum Gravity. 37(1). 15004–15004. 1 indexed citations
12.
Prokhorov, L., V. P. Mitrofanov, K. Haughian, et al.. (2017). Upper limits on the mechanical loss of silicate bonds in a silicon tuning fork oscillator. Physics Letters A. 382(33). 2186–2191. 4 indexed citations
13.
Abernathy, M. R., N. D. Smith, W. Z. Korth, et al.. (2016). Measurement of mechanical loss in the Acktar Black coating of silicon wafers. Classical and Quantum Gravity. 33(18). 185002–185002. 2 indexed citations
14.
Braginsky, V. B., et al.. (2016). Background to the discovery of gravitational waves. Uspekhi Fizicheskih Nauk. 186(9). 968–974. 9 indexed citations
15.
Braginsky, V. B., I. A. Bilenko, S. P. Vyatchanin, et al.. (2016). The road to the discovery of gravitational waves. Physics-Uspekhi. 59(9). 879–885. 8 indexed citations
16.
Prokhorov, L., et al.. (2015). Effects of humidity on the interaction between a fused silica test mass and an electrostatic drive. Physics Letters A. 379(40-41). 2535–2540.
17.
Prokhorov, L. & V. P. Mitrofanov. (2015). Mechanical losses of oscillators fabricated in silicon wafers. Classical and Quantum Gravity. 32(19). 195002–195002. 4 indexed citations
18.
Prokhorov, L. & V. P. Mitrofanov. (2010). Space charge polarization in fused silica test masses of a gravitational wave detector associated with an electrostatic drive. Classical and Quantum Gravity. 27(22). 225014–225014. 9 indexed citations
19.
Mitrofanov, V. P., L. Prokhorov, K. V. Tokmakov, & P. A. Willems. (2004). Investigation of effects associated with variation of electric charge on a fused silica test mass. Classical and Quantum Gravity. 21(5). S1083–S1089. 7 indexed citations
20.
Mitrofanov, V. P., L. Prokhorov, & K. V. Tokmakov. (2002). Variation of electric charge on prototype of fused silica test mass of gravitational wave antenna. Physics Letters A. 300(4-5). 370–374. 18 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026