L. Amadio

16 papers receiving 245 citations

Peers

L. Amadio
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Aging 9
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 56
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 9
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 40
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 28
Replace Wojciech Roczniak with:
Wojciech Roczniak Poland
Lyda Williams United States
Ayrun Nessa United Kingdom
Oswaldo Alves Mora Brazil
Slavina B. Goleva United States
Daniella E. Chusyd United States
Ryoji HOKAO Japan
Anna L. Boudoures United States
R Bonacasa Italy
Herman L. Johnson United States
L. Amadio relative to Wojciech Roczniak Poland Wojciech Roczniak's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.5×
Wojciech Roczniak · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by L. Amadio

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of L. Amadio's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by L. Amadio with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites L. Amadio more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by L. Amadio

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by L. Amadio. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by L. Amadio. The network helps show where L. Amadio may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside L. Amadio, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with L. Amadio Line = papers co-authored together L. Amadio links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 1984128
2 199532
3 199028
4 198718
5 199613
6 199511
7 19906
8 19954
9 19924
10
Blood pressure self-measurement in the elderly: differences between automatic and semi-automatic systems.
19953
11 19922
12 20152
13 19952
14 19952
15 19901
16 19911

About L. Amadio

L. Amadio is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Cognitive Neuroscience and Surgery, having authored 16 papers that have together received 257 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies (3 papers), Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins (3 papers), Biotin and Related Studies (2 papers), Heart Failure Treatment and Management (2 papers), Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health (2 papers), Body Composition Measurement Techniques (1 paper), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (1 paper) and Sodium Intake and Health (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Aging (9 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (56 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (9 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (40 citations) and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (28 citations). L. Amadio has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, Switzerland and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Eugenio Mocchegiani, Ν. Fabris, Claudio Franceschi, Federico Licastro, Maria Zannotti, Massimo Boemi, Richard W. James, C. Sirolla, D Pometta and P. Fumelli. Their work appears in journals such as Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, Diabetologia, Diabetes Care and The Lancet.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact