Kylie Bailey

414 total citations
19 papers, 279 citations indexed

About

Kylie Bailey is a scholar working on Social Psychology, General Health Professions and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Kylie Bailey has authored 19 papers receiving a total of 279 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Social Psychology, 6 papers in General Health Professions and 3 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. Recurrent topics in Kylie Bailey's work include Appreciative Inquiry and Organizational Change (2 papers), Team Dynamics and Performance (2 papers) and Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare (2 papers). Kylie Bailey is often cited by papers focused on Appreciative Inquiry and Organizational Change (2 papers), Team Dynamics and Performance (2 papers) and Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare (2 papers). Kylie Bailey collaborates with scholars based in Australia, New Zealand and Poland. Kylie Bailey's co-authors include Jun Shi Lai, Khanrin P. Vashum, Gabriel Nowak, Mark McEvoy, Annette Moxey, Amanda Baker, Terry J. Lewin, Rosemary A. Webster, Parker Magin and David Sibbritt and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of Affective Disorders and Journal of Clinical Medicine.

In The Last Decade

Kylie Bailey

18 papers receiving 270 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Kylie Bailey Australia 7 56 51 51 48 45 19 279
Elizabeth Andersen United States 8 39 0.7× 40 0.8× 36 0.7× 31 0.6× 32 0.7× 18 373
Sadaf Ahmed Pakistan 7 19 0.3× 45 0.9× 45 0.9× 18 0.4× 22 0.5× 54 252
E. Cortese Italy 8 36 0.6× 13 0.3× 87 1.7× 28 0.6× 25 0.6× 8 317
KS Jagannatha Rao India 5 50 0.9× 47 0.9× 51 1.0× 11 0.2× 102 2.3× 7 348
Dimitri Daldegan‐Bueno Brazil 12 64 1.1× 42 0.8× 185 3.6× 65 1.4× 14 0.3× 34 359
Genevieve Moseley Australia 3 29 0.5× 28 0.5× 51 1.0× 13 0.3× 117 2.6× 3 299
Xiujing Cao China 9 27 0.5× 14 0.3× 75 1.5× 17 0.4× 41 0.9× 17 385
Mansour Shakiba Iran 11 14 0.3× 41 0.8× 100 2.0× 35 0.7× 11 0.2× 38 308
Fernando Mora Spain 13 17 0.3× 24 0.5× 70 1.4× 23 0.5× 98 2.2× 41 468

Countries citing papers authored by Kylie Bailey

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kylie Bailey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kylie Bailey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kylie Bailey more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kylie Bailey

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kylie Bailey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kylie Bailey. The network helps show where Kylie Bailey may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kylie Bailey

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kylie Bailey. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kylie Bailey based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kylie Bailey. Kylie Bailey is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
1.
Lum, Alistair, Kylie Bailey, Alison Beck, et al.. (2023). SMART recovery for youth: a small, exploratory qualitative study examining the potential of a mutual-aid, peer support addictive behaviour change program for young people. Addiction Science & Clinical Practice. 18(1). 30–30. 4 indexed citations
2.
McMillan, Sara S., Sarira El‐Den, Claire L. O’Reilly, et al.. (2022). A training programme for community pharmacists to support people living with severe and persistent mental illness: Intervention mapping in the context of a pandemic. Health Education Journal. 81(8). 964–981. 10 indexed citations
3.
Doherty, Emma, Melanie Kingsland, John Wiggers, et al.. (2022). The effectiveness of implementation strategies in improving preconception and antenatal preventive care: a systematic review. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 3(1). 121–121. 10 indexed citations
4.
Lum, Alistair, Kylie Bailey, Alison Beck, et al.. (2022). SMART Recovery for Youth: A Qualitative Study Exploring the Potential of a Mutual-Aid, Peer Support Health Behaviour Change Program for Young People. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations
5.
Bailey, Kylie, et al.. (2021). Anthropological Prosociality via Sub-Group Level Selection. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science. 56(1). 180–205. 1 indexed citations
6.
Doherty, Emma, Melanie Kingsland, Luke Wolfenden, et al.. (2019). Implementation strategies to improve preconception and antenatal care for tobacco smoking, alcohol consumption and weight management: a systematic review protocol. Systematic Reviews. 8(1). 285–285. 6 indexed citations
7.
Bailey, Kylie, et al.. (2018). The PILAR Model as a Measure of Peer Ratings of Collaboration Viability in Small Groups. Social Sciences. 7(3). 49–49.
8.
Stojanovski, Elizabeth, et al.. (2018). Collaboration Vouchers: A Policy to Increase Population Wellbeing. Societies. 8(2). 37–37. 4 indexed citations
9.
Stojanovski, Elizabeth, et al.. (2018). PILAR: A Model of Collaboration to Encapsulate Social Psychology. Review of General Psychology. 22(3). 321–333. 6 indexed citations
10.
Paúl, Jonathan, et al.. (2018). Organisational Psychology and Appreciative Inquiry: Unifying the Empirical and the Mystical. 69–90. 6 indexed citations
11.
Stojanovski, Elizabeth, et al.. (2017). Respondent disengagement from a peer assessment instrument measuring Collaboration Viability. Australasian journal of engineering education. 22(2). 95–106. 4 indexed citations
12.
Stojanovski, Elizabeth, et al.. (2017). Are We Collaborating Yet? Employee Assessment of Peer’s Perceptions. International Journal of Human Resource Studies. 7(4). 175–175. 4 indexed citations
13.
Bailey, Kylie, Amanda Baker, Patrick McElduff, & David J. Kavanagh. (2016). The Influence of Parental Emotional Neglect on Assault Victims Seeking Treatment for Depressed Mood and Alcohol Misuse: A Pilot Study. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 5(10). 88–88. 6 indexed citations
14.
Bailey, Kylie, et al.. (2016). Collaboration Guidelines to Transform Culture. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 3(3). 3 indexed citations
15.
Lai, Jun Shi, Annette Moxey, Gabriel Nowak, et al.. (2011). The efficacy of zinc supplementation in depression: Systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Journal of Affective Disorders. 136(1-2). e31–e39. 134 indexed citations
16.
Bailey, Kylie. (2011). Dog Ear Cafe: How the Mt Theo Program Beat the Curse of Petrol Sniffing. Drug and Alcohol Review. 30(4). 449–450. 1 indexed citations
17.
Magin, Parker, David Sibbritt, & Kylie Bailey. (2009). The Relationship Between Psychiatric Illnesses and Skin Disease. Archives of Dermatology. 145(8). 896–902. 17 indexed citations
18.
Bailey, Kylie. (2009). Behavioral Case Formulation and Intervention: A Functional Analytic Approach. Drug and Alcohol Review. 28(5). 577–578. 10 indexed citations
19.
Bailey, Kylie, Amanda Baker, Rosemary A. Webster, & Terry J. Lewin. (2004). Pilot randomized controlled trial of a brief alcohol intervention group for adolescents. Drug and Alcohol Review. 23(2). 157–166. 52 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026