Kyle Mede
Impact in
-
- Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
-
- Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
- Astro and Planetary Science
Papers in ⓘ
-
- Astronomy and Astrophysical Research 5
-
- Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies 5
- Astro and Planetary Science 1
- Co-authors
- G. R. Knapp (4 shared papers)Masahiko Hayashi (5 shared papers)Nemanja Jovanović (4 shared papers)Timothy D. Brandt (6 shared papers)Mary Anne Limbach (5 shared papers)Michael W. McElwain (4 shared papers)Craig Loomis (5 shared papers)Naruhisa Takato (5 shared papers)
- Journals
- Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union (1 paper)2022 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data) (1 paper)Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE (3 papers)arXiv (Cornell University) (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- JapanUnited States
In The Last Decade
Kyle Mede
7 papers receiving 40 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 21
- Instrumentation 21
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 31
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 20
- Transportation 4
- Aerospace Engineering 7
Countries citing papers authored by Kyle Mede
This map shows the geographic impact of Kyle Mede's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kyle Mede with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kyle Mede more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kyle Mede
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kyle Mede. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kyle Mede. The network helps show where Kyle Mede may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 22 scholars most cited alongside Kyle Mede, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2015 | 15 | |
| 2 | 2014 | 9 | |
| 3 | 2014 | 6 | |
| 4 | Data Reduction Pipeline for the CHARIS Integral-Field Spectrograph | 2017 | 5 |
| 5 | 2022 | 5 | |
| 6 | The CHARIS IFS for high contrast imaging at Subaru | 2015 | 1 |
| 7 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 8 | 2013 | 0 |
About Kyle Mede
Kyle Mede is a scholar working on Instrumentation, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Transportation, Geology and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 8 papers that have together received 42 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (5 papers), Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (5 papers), Adaptive optics and wavefront sensing (4 papers), Human Mobility and Location-Based Analysis (2 papers), Astro and Planetary Science (1 paper), Video Surveillance and Tracking Methods (1 paper), Data Management and Algorithms (1 paper) and Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Instrumentation (21 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (31 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (20 citations), Transportation (4 citations) and Aerospace Engineering (7 citations). Kyle Mede has collaborated with scholars based in Japan and United States. Frequent co-authors include G. R. Knapp, Masahiko Hayashi, Nemanja Jovanović, Timothy D. Brandt, Mary Anne Limbach, Michael W. McElwain, Craig Loomis, Naruhisa Takato, N. Jeremy Kasdin and Tyler D. Groff. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union, 2022 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data), Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE and arXiv (Cornell University).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.