Craig Loomis

27.3k total citations
24 papers, 160 citations indexed

About

Craig Loomis is a scholar working on Instrumentation, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Astronomy and Astrophysics. According to data from OpenAlex, Craig Loomis has authored 24 papers receiving a total of 160 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 20 papers in Instrumentation, 17 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and 16 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics. Recurrent topics in Craig Loomis's work include Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (20 papers), Adaptive optics and wavefront sensing (17 papers) and Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (13 papers). Craig Loomis is often cited by papers focused on Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (20 papers), Adaptive optics and wavefront sensing (17 papers) and Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (13 papers). Craig Loomis collaborates with scholars based in United States, Japan and France. Craig Loomis's co-authors include G. R. Knapp, Tyler D. Groff, N. Jeremy Kasdin, Mary Anne Limbach, Janice E. Cuny, Michael W. McElwain, Timothy D. Brandt, James E. Gunn, Jeffrey Chilcote and Naruhisa Takato and has published in prestigious journals such as The Astrophysical Journal, Icarus and International Journal of Parallel Programming.

In The Last Decade

Craig Loomis

17 papers receiving 145 citations

Peers

Craig Loomis

INSTR

AMPO

EEE

E. Wieprecht Germany

J. D. Offenberg United States

A. Sivaramakrishnan India

Tony J. Farrell Australia

Stan Miziarski Australia

Junichi Noumaru Japan

Oliver LeFevre France

M. Azzaro Spain

Frank Dionies Germany

J.‐B. Daban France

E. Wieprecht Germany

Craig Loomis

60 ×0.5

27 ×0.4

INSTR

31 ×0.7

AMPO

16 ×1.1

EEE

2 ×0.2

Citations per year, relative to Craig Loomis Craig Loomis (= 1×) peers E. Wieprecht

Countries citing papers authored by Craig Loomis

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Craig Loomis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Craig Loomis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Craig Loomis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Craig Loomis

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Craig Loomis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Craig Loomis. The network helps show where Craig Loomis may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Craig Loomis

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Craig Loomis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Craig Loomis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Craig Loomis. Craig Loomis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Wang, Shiang‐Yu, Jennifer L. Karr, James E. Gunn, et al.. (2024). Prime Focus Spectrograph (PFS) for Subaru Telescope: the optimization of convergence for Cobra positioners. 97–97.

Rousselle, J., Yuki Moritani, Fabrice Madec, et al.. (2024). Prime Focus Spectrograph (PFS) for Subaru telescope: integration and test of the last spectrograph modules. 95–95.

Strauss, Michael A., Robert H. Lupton, P. A. Price, et al.. (2024). Sky-subtraction for the Subaru Prime Focus Spectrograph. 96–96.

Smee, Stephen A., James E. Gunn, Robert H. Barkhouser, et al.. (2022). Performance of the near-infrared camera for the Subaru Prime Focus Spectrograph. HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe). 507. 287–287.

Čaplar, Neven, Robert H. Lupton, James E. Gunn, et al.. (2022). Prime focus spectrograph (PFS) for the Subaru Telescope: 2D modeling of the point spread function. 122. 262–262.

Gunn, James E., et al.. (2022). Subaru Night-Sky Spectrograph (SuNSS): fiber cable construction. 264–264.

Wang, Shiang‐Yu, James E. Gunn, Craig Loomis, et al.. (2020). Prime Focus Spectrograph (PFS): the metrology camera system. 174–174. 4 indexed citations

Wang, Shiang‐Yu, Chih-Yi Wen, Hrand Aghazarian, et al.. (2018). Software development of fiber positioning sequencer for prime focus spectrograph of Subaru telescope. 9908. 81–81. 1 indexed citations

Brandt, Timothy D., Tyler D. Groff, Jeffrey Chilcote, et al.. (2017). Data Reduction Pipeline for the CHARIS Integral-Field Spectrograph. arXiv (Cornell University). 5 indexed citations

10.

Brandt, Timothy D., Tyler D. Groff, Jeffrey Chilcote, et al.. (2017). Data reduction pipeline for the CHARIS integral-field spectrograph I: detector readout calibration and data cube extraction. Journal of Astronomical Telescopes Instruments and Systems. 3(4). 1–1. 27 indexed citations

11.

Smee, Stephen A., James E. Gunn, Fabrice Madec, et al.. (2016). Visible camera cryostat design and performance for the SuMIRe Prime Focus Spectrograph (PFS). Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 9908. 99088Y–99088Y. 1 indexed citations

12.

Shimono, Atsushi, Naoyuki Tamura, Naruhisa Takato, et al.. (2016). The survey operation software system development for Prime Focus Spectrograph (PFS) on Subaru Telescope. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 9913. 99133B–99133B. 4 indexed citations

13.

Gunn, James E., Murdock Hart, Craig Loomis, et al.. (2016). Detector and control system design and performance for the SuMIRe prime focus spectrograph (PFS) cameras. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 9908. 990893–990893. 1 indexed citations

14.

Groff, Tyler D., N. Jeremy Kasdin, Mary Anne Limbach, et al.. (2015). The CHARIS IFS for high contrast imaging at Subaru. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 9605. 96051C–96051C. 15 indexed citations

15.

Smee, Stephen A., James E. Gunn, Robert H. Barkhouser, et al.. (2014). The near infrared camera for the Subaru Prime Focus Spectrograph. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 9147. 91472V–91472V. 5 indexed citations

16.

Yamada, Yoshihiko, Tadafumi Takata, Hisanori Furusawa, et al.. (2014). Development of database system for data obtained by Hyper Suprime-Cam on Subaru Telescope. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 9149. 91492I–91492I.

17.

Groff, Tyler D., N. Jeremy Kasdin, Mary Anne Limbach, et al.. (2014). Construction and status of the CHARIS high contrast imaging spectrograph. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 9 indexed citations

18.

Limbach, Mary Anne, Tyler D. Groff, N. Jeremy Kasdin, et al.. (2014). ERIS: the exoplanet high-resolution image simulator for CHARIS. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 6 indexed citations

19.

Kruse, Ethan, E. Berger, G. R. Knapp, et al.. (2010). CHROMOSPHERIC VARIABILITY IN SLOAN DIGITAL SKY SURVEY M DWARFS. II. SHORT-TIMESCALE Hα VARIABILITY. The Astrophysical Journal. 722(2). 1352–1359. 25 indexed citations

20.

Cuny, Janice E., et al.. (1990). ParaGraph: Graph editor support for parallel programming environments. International Journal of Parallel Programming. 19(2). 75–110. 18 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact