Kyle D. Hope

26 papers receiving 235 citations

Peers

Kyle D. Hope
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 56
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 34
  • Cell Biology 20
  • Surgery 50
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 5
Replace Ripu Daman Arora with:
Ripu Daman Arora India
Daniëlle M. Hendriks Netherlands
Elena Medvedeva Russia
Jakob Albrecht Germany
Bénédicte Nauche Canada
Joanna H. Campbell United States
Itsuko Sato Japan
Zubair Shahid Bashir United States
Jeffrey D. Trojan United States
Anand Jagannath United States
Kyle D. Hope relative to Ripu Daman Arora India Ripu Daman Arora's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.6×
Ripu Daman Arora · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kyle D. Hope

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kyle D. Hope's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kyle D. Hope with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kyle D. Hope more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kyle D. Hope

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kyle D. Hope. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kyle D. Hope. The network helps show where Kyle D. Hope may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kyle D. Hope, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kyle D. Hope Line = papers co-authored together Kyle D. Hope links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202057
2 201230
3 202024
4 201116
5 201816
6 201913
7 202112
8 201810
9 202410
10 20239
11 20217
12 20206
13 20246
14 20185
15 20195
16 20224
17 20213
18 20212
19 20232
20 20242

About Kyle D. Hope

Kyle D. Hope is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Surgery, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Epidemiology, having authored 30 papers that have together received 246 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (6 papers), Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes (6 papers), Congenital Heart Disease Studies (5 papers), Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (3 papers), Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (3 papers), Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Studies (2 papers), Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments (2 papers) and Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (56 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (34 citations), Cell Biology (20 citations), Surgery (50 citations) and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (5 citations). Kyle D. Hope has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Joshua T. Gamse, Jonathan N. Johnson, Devyani Chowdhury, Christina Ronai, Christopher Scott Snyder, Sharon Weinberger, Anirban N Banerjee, Hari P. Tunuguntla, Yan Wang and Caleb A. Doll. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation, Pediatric Transplantation, Journal of Cardiac Failure, Developmental Biology and Hospital Pediatrics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact