Kristopher M. Depew
- Organic Chemistry top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Pharmacology top 10%
- Pharmacology top 5%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
- Co-authors
- Samuel J. DanishefskyStephen P. MarsdenStuart L. SchreiberChristian FritzJames R. PorterPaul J. HergenrotherWilliam G. BornmannAndrzej Zatorski
- Topics
- Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis (5 papers)Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods (5 papers)Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (4 papers)
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesJournal of the American Chemical SocietyTetrahedron Letters
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Kristopher M. Depew
16 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
- Organic Chemistry 695
- Molecular Biology 600
- Pharmacology 168
- Pharmacology 118
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 70
Countries citing papers authored by Kristopher M. Depew
This map shows the geographic impact of Kristopher M. Depew's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kristopher M. Depew with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kristopher M. Depew more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kristopher M. Depew
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kristopher M. Depew. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kristopher M. Depew. The network helps show where Kristopher M. Depew may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kristopher M. Depew
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kristopher M. Depew. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kristopher M. Depew based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kristopher M. Depew. Kristopher M. Depew is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10 | |
| 2 | 8 | |
| 3 | 156 | |
| 4 | 6 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 50 | |
| 7 | 154 | |
| 8 | 15 | |
| 9 | 220 | |
| 10 | 148 | |
| 11 | 25 | |
| 12 | 59 | |
| 13 | 9 | |
| 14 | 70 | |
| 15 | 27 | |
| 16 | 162 |
About Kristopher M. Depew
Kristopher M. Depew is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Organic Chemistry and Pharmacology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis (5 papers), Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods (5 papers) and Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organic Chemistry (695 citations), Pharmacology (118 citations) and Toxicology (42 citations). Kristopher M. Depew has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Samuel J. Danishefsky, Stephen P. Marsden, Stuart L. Schreiber, Christian Fritz, James R. Porter, Paul J. Hergenrother, William G. Bornmann, Andrzej Zatorski, Danuta Zatorska and Samuel J. Danishefsky. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of the American Chemical Society and Tetrahedron Letters.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.