Kristi S. Anseth
- Biomedical Engineering top 0.01%
- Biomaterials top 0.01%
- Molecular Medicine top 0.01%
- Organic Chemistry top 0.1%
- Cell Biology top 0.02%
- Co-authors
- Christopher N. BowmanMark W. TibbittStephanie J. BryantCole A. DeForestApril M. KloxinJason A. BurdickChien‐Chi LinChelsea N. Salinas
- Topics
- 3D Printing in Biomedical Research (102 papers)Cellular Mechanics and Interactions (72 papers)Hydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications (67 papers)
- Journals
- NatureScienceChemical Reviews
- Partner nations
- United StatesSpainSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Kristi S. Anseth
440 papers receiving 45.6k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 183
- Biomedical Engineering 22.4k
- Biomaterials 15.0k
- Molecular Medicine 10.0k
- Organic Chemistry 7.9k
- Cell Biology 7.8k
Countries citing papers authored by Kristi S. Anseth
This map shows the geographic impact of Kristi S. Anseth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kristi S. Anseth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kristi S. Anseth more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kristi S. Anseth
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kristi S. Anseth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kristi S. Anseth. The network helps show where Kristi S. Anseth may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kristi S. Anseth
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kristi S. Anseth. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kristi S. Anseth based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kristi S. Anseth. Kristi S. Anseth is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 7 | |
| 7 | 19 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 75 | |
| 11 | 33 | |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 16 | |
| 14 | Tissue geometry drives deterministic organoid patterningbreakdown → | 317 |
| 15 | 54 | |
| 16 | 15 | |
| 17 | 6 | |
| 18 | 127 | |
| 19 | 35 | |
| 20 | 65 |
About Kristi S. Anseth
Kristi S. Anseth is a scholar working on Molecular Medicine, Biomaterials and Cell Biology, having authored 447 papers that have together received 46.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include 3D Printing in Biomedical Research (102 papers), Cellular Mechanics and Interactions (72 papers) and Hydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications (67 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Molecular Medicine (10.0k citations), Biomaterials (15.0k citations) and Biomedical Engineering (22.4k citations). Kristi S. Anseth has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Spain and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Christopher N. Bowman, Mark W. Tibbitt, Stephanie J. Bryant, Cole A. DeForest, April M. Kloxin, Jason A. Burdick, Chien‐Chi Lin, Chelsea N. Salinas, Charles R. Nuttelman and Danielle S. W. Benoit. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Science and Chemical Reviews.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.